Posted by TRACKING ECO-FAS on March Sun 16th 8:10 PM - Never Expires
download | new post

    
WHAT IS ECO-FASCISM?
  
(1) The Very Definition of Eco-fascism
  
http://www.infowars.com/environmental-fascism-the-ecofascists-are-slowly-but-surely-taking-over-america/
  
(2) Stacy Lynne Exposes Eco-Fascist Abuse
  
http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Hodges/2013/12/Hodges_1_121513_210000.mp3
http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Hodges/2013/12/Hodges_3_121513_230000.mp3
http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Hodges/2013/06/Hodges_3_060213_230000.mp3
  
(3) Why is Everyone Talking About UN Agenda 21?
  
http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/uploads/4/4/6/6/4466371/why_is_everyone_talking_about_un_agenda_21.pdf
  
(4) MIT Professor ; It�s About �Crony Capitalism�
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhEdTW7hPRs
  
Mirror here � http://fileb.ag/wikdc7hyvtkx
  
  
AND HOW DOES ECO-FASCISM EFFECT POPULATIONS?
  
(5) Ways Government Keeps Native Americans In Poverty
  
Eco-fascist regulations encourage poverty and control.
  
 If governments and their corporate-masters had their
way, everyone would be forced to live in federalized
�preservations� where every aspect of life is audited.
  
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/03/13/5-ways-the-government-keeps-native-americans-in-poverty/
  
(6) �We need to reduce consumption by 80%!�
  
http://www.iclei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ICLEI_WS/Documents/events/gth/presentations/ICLEI_GTH_ICLEIeuropeansecretariat_20130412.pdf
  
Mirror here � http://fileb.ag/gkeagsv1odmf
  
(7) The Redistribution of Consumption
  
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/1147/and_now_the_redistribution_of_consumption
  
(8) The Growing Threat of an Economic Tyranny
  
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_323_32177.php
  
(9) Obama Promises to Bankrupt US Coal Industry
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw
  
Mirror here � http://fileb.ag/ivrkhbsxxf4h
  
(10) THE SECRET BEHIND THE �ENVIRONMENTAL� AGENDA,
NATURAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION TO THE SUPER RICH!
  
http://www.buildfreedom.com/news/archive.php?id=4411
  
(11) Neighborhood Property Seized ... FOR NOTHING
  
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/kelo-revisited_776021.html
  
  
HOW HAVE ECO-FASCISTS EFFECTED PEOPLE SO FAR?
    
(12) How Dare You Wash Cars for Money!?
  
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/high-school-cheerleader-car-wash-violates-environmental-laws/
  
(13) How Dare You Plant a Vegetable Garden!?
  
http://www.infowars.com/florida-couple-sues-city-after-being-forced-to-uproot-family-vegetable-garden/
  
(14) How Dare You Use an Old Wood Stove!?
  
http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-12/documents/proposed_requirements_for_wood_stoves_and_pellet_stoves.pdf%20
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17776-epa-wants-to-snuff-out-wood-and-pellet-stoves
http://www.independentsentinel.com/epa-bans-most-wood-burning-stoves-in-a-corrupt-scheme-fireplaces-next/
  
(15) How Dare You Use Old Electric Meters?
  
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/deferring-inevitable_781518.html
  
(16) How Dare You Use Incandescent Lightbulbs!?
  
http://reason.com/reasontv/2014/01/09/the-dumbest-new-ban-in-2014-incandescent
  
(17) How Dare Gun Owners Buy Lead Ammunition!?
  
http://www.nssfblog.com/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition-take-action-now/
  
(18) How Dare We Use Coal Powered Energy!?
  
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/energy/item/16250-obama-epa-war-on-coal-to-shut-200-coal-fired-plants-devastate-economy
  
(19) How Dare We Use Plastic Bags!?
  
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Plastic-Bag-Ban-at-Large-Retail-Stores-Begins-in-Los-Angeles-Recyclable-Reusable--238356621.html
  
(20) How Dare We Smoke Cigarretes!?
  
http://voices.yahoo.com/smoking-ban-passed-illinois-lawmakers-325179.html
  
(21) How Dare We Use Electronic Cigarretes!?
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7ZRYctuzMU
http://mashable.com/2013/12/19/new-york-city-adds-e-cigarettes-to-smoking-ban/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/05/democrats_call_for_ban_on_e-cigarettes_on_capitol_121470.html
  
(22) How Dare We Buy Heirloom Seeds!?
  
http://truthstreammedia.com/eu-to-ban-heirloom-seeds-and-criminalize-unregistered-gardens/
  
(23) How Dare You Feed Wildlife!?
  
http://govtslaves.info/jailed-without-bond-81-year-old-woman-left-birdseed-outside-animals-property/
  
(24) How Dare There Be Prosperity!?
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/21/un-global-prosperity-is-causing-global-warming/
  
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/19/co2-emissions-outsourced-rich-nations-rising-economies
  
(25) How Dare Kids Set Up a Lemonade Stand!?
  
http://theweek.com/article/index/255939/whatrsquos-the-point-of-regulating-lemonade-stands
  
(26) How Dare You Own Property!?
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/14/Wyoming-Suing-Obama-s-EPA-for-Stealing-1-Million-Acres-of-State-Property
  
(27) How Dare You Collect Rainwater!?
  
http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/illegality-of-rainwater-collection/
  
(28) Need Water? Tough Luck!
  
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/01/31/dwr-cuts-allocations-to-organizations-buying-water-from-the-state/
  
(29) How Dare There Be Gold Mining!?
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/28/epa-moves-against-major-alaska-gold-mine-could-sideline-project-over-salmon/
  
(30) How Dare You Live Off The Grid!?
  
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/02/court-rules-off-the-grid-living-is-illegal/
  
  
TRACKING THE TRENDS OF ECO-FASCISM!
    
(31) Incandescent Ban to Bankrupt Bird Care Centre
  
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/incandescent-bulb-ban-leaves-bird-care-centre-with-dim-hope-1.2492890
  
 Ottawa�s Wild Bird Care Centre has put the call
out for incandescent light bulbs, which it uses to
provide warmth for injured and recovering birds,
after the federal government banned manufacturers
from making the bulbs.
  
 In Canada, the more energy-efficient compact
fluorescent light bulbs are considered the norm.
The incandescent light bulbs use more power, but
they are also warmer and serve an important role
inside incubators.
  
 �As the light bulb is on, it will obviously warm
things up and then the setting will turn it off to
keep the right temperature,� explained Mireille
Goguen, who works at the centre.
  
 She said they were caught off-guard by the bulb
ban and they are already running short on
incandescent bulbs. Now they are asking people
to donate 100-watt bulbs.
  
 �(We will take) as many as possible. If people
have them hanging around we will take them or if
they want to buy them for us it would be much
appreciated,� said Goguen.
  
 Donations can be dropped off at the centre,
which is located on Moodie Drive in the city�s
west end.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(32) Plastic Bag Ban is a TAX SCAM
  
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Opponents-Slam-Proposed-Plastic-Bag-Ban-236474401.html
  
 Opponents of a proposed plastic bag ban gathered
Wednesday to call on the San Diego City Council to
abandon the plan to remove plastic bags from local
stores.
  
 Community leaders, including Mark Arabo, president
of the Neighborhood Market Association, held a press
conference in front of Rainbow Market on Federal
Boulevard in which they called the proposed ban a
tax scam that will negatively impact working-class
San Diegans.
  
 �This is a terrible plan. It�s terrible because
the solution is worse than the so-called problem,�
said Arabo. �It�s a classic case of politicians
attempting to do something for the environment,
in part to appease some environmental groups,
without seeing the bigger picture.�
  
 The proposed ban would remove plastic bags from
stores while imposing a paper bag tax on customers.
Shoppers would be charged 10 cents for each paper
bag they might need at a store.
  
 �This ban will have reaching ramifications. It�ll
cost taxpayers � mothers, fathers and brothers �
more money when they go shopping for groceries,�
said Arabo.
  
 Though the ban is designed to reduce waste and
help the environment, Arabo argued that plastic
bags only make up one-third of one percent of
the waste stream.
  
 On the other end of the plastic bag ban debate,
Sherri Lightner, San Diego City Council President
Pro Tem, District 1, supports the proposed ban.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(33) Eco-fascists Want to Police Households
  
http://www.chicoer.com/editorials/ci_24875035/editorial-toilet-police-dont-want-job
  
 The state mandates water-saving toilets and showers
in all homes, but obviously didn�t think long about
how to achieve that.
  
 First the city of Chico had the ban on nuclear weapons,
then wood-burning stoves, then plastic bags. Now
comes a ban on high-flow toilets. And if you think
the city can�t enforce that, then you haven�t met
the toilet police.
  
 OK, so the title �Toilet Police� probably doesn�t
appear on any city worker�s business card, but
that�s what they are.
  
 But let�s not blame city building inspectors for
an odd law � or even the Chico City Council. For
once, this ridiculous save-the-world concept doesn�t
come from the council, but rather from the busybodies
in the state Legislature. They passed a law that took
effect Jan. 1 that requires water-conserving plumbing
fixtures on any home built before 1994.
  
 How will that be enforced? Well, if a property has
any work done that requires a building permit from
a city or county, that entity�s inspector must verify
that the home has low-flow toilets, showers and faucets.
  
 To make it even more disturbing, the low-flow
inspection doesn�t occur if you�re getting plumbing
work. It occurs if you�re getting any work that requires
a building permit, such as getting a new heater, new
windows or converting a garage into a den. Uh, maybe.
  
 So under the letter of the law, if a homeowner buys
a new water heater or fireplace insert for a couple
hundred dollars, he or she might spend considerably
more than that converting all toilets, faucets and
showerheads to low-flow devices.
  
 City and county building inspectors don�t want to be
toilet police. We can�t imagine them wanting to spend
time checking a person�s toilet when they�re there
to check an air conditioner. They�re taking a loose
interpretation of the law for now, and won�t inspect
toilets during projects like repairs and maintenance
that don�t involve plumbing.
  
 But there�s no guarantee the state, which passed
the law, won�t require cities and counties to enforce
a strict interpretation.
  
 With all the uncertainty, it entices a homeowner to
ignore the government requirement to get a building
permit for minor home improvement projects.
  
 Governments should be concerned if fewer people take
out building permits. It means less revenue for
cash-strapped local governments.
  
 The building industry is concerned that residents
may put off rebuilding and home improvement projects
because they would include this unwanted expense.
With the building industry and contractors finally
showing signs of recovery from the recession, we
don�t want to see new obstacles.
  
 Once again the state passes a goofy law without
thinking about the consequences, since somebody else
has to enforce it. The city and county building
departments urge residents not to be scared off by
the new laws, to call and ask questions. It seems
they are like the rest of us, trying to figure out
how long they can ignore the fools in Sacramento
before they get caught.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(34) DOE Eco-fascists Roll Out Household Spy Grid
  
 DOE says its energy-scoring spyware - called the
Home Energy Scoring Tool - is like a vehicle�s
mile-per-gallon rating because it allows government
to compare the energy performance of individual homes
to other homes nationwide. It also provides homeowners
with suggestions (or mandates, in the near future)
for �improving their homes� efficiency.�
  
 The software is part of the government�s effort
to reduce the nation�s energy consumption; but it�s
also billed as a way to keep home-retrofitting going,
at a time when stimulus funds for weather-proofing
have run out - you see, the federated fascists care
more about spying on our energy consumption rather
than providing weather-proof options for our homes.
  
Read the rest of the �trendy� PR garbage here,
  
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/doe-plugs-energy-rating-homes-similar-mpg-rating-cars
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(35) �Sustainable Communities Investment Authority�
Plan to Bulldoze Households for Corporate Projects
  
http://benswann.com/californias-dangerous-idea-give-unelected-bureaucrats-the-power-to-confiscate-the-private-property-of-americans/
  
 California�s Senate Bill 1 is what the founding
fathers fought against. Straight from the UN Agenda
21�s playbook, SB1 will give power to a county to
form a �Sustainable Communities Investment Authority�
(SCIA). These Authorities have the power of eminent
domain and can confiscate private property to build
�sustainable communities.� The bill essentially paves
the way for the loss of any true private property in
California, resulting in the loss of freedom and
driving down home values. If the Senate passes the
modified bill, only Governor Jerry Brown (D � CA)
will stand in its way of becoming law.
  
 This means that city and county governments can
create unelected bureaucracies with the power to do
what�s necessary to create �sustainable communities.�
It also means that the definition of �blight� will
change from the original definition of abandoned
and decaying buildings on residential lots to a
much wider definition including anything the
bureaucracies need to create sustainable communities.
  
 Not only would the government be able to use eminent
domain to procure land for public transportation,
it could take private homes within half a mile of
that public transportation in the name of creating
a sustainable community. A private home is not
really private if it could be taken at any time
to create low income, low energy housing.
  
 According to Lawrence J. McQuillan, �each Authority
will be granted powers to build �Sustainable Communities�
means jamming people into dense, urban centers using
high-density residential housing and high-intensity
retail and commercial buildings near mass transit
corridors. To that end, SB 1 will grant each
Authority unprecedented powers.�
  
 Eminent domain has gradually grown to be one of the
most oppressive government policies. Since the
SCOTUS� decision in Kelo v. City of New London,
eminent domain continues to be the enemy of property
owners. Homeowners have lost their homes to private
development projects. People have been paid less for
their land than they originally paid for it. Businesses
have even been forced to sell their buildings to
corporations. It has become perhaps the most clearly
identifiable example of crony capitalism and corruption
in the country. The government has failed to protect
citizen�s natural rights: protecting life, liberty,
and property.
  
 In 2011, citizens voiced outrage over the ideas
presented by activists, environmentalists and
private developers. Property owners are worried
that Senate Bill 1 will pass and the threat of
increased taxes and possible property confiscation
will become a reality in California.
  
Read the full analysis of Senate Bill 1.
  
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_1_cfa_20130307_114042_sen_comm.html
  
Sponsors ; Darrell Steinberg & Mark DeSaulnier
  
http://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB1/2013
  
SB1 Declares Suburbs & Rural Areas �Blight�
  
http://www.bayarealiberty.com/libertyblog/?page_id=942
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(36) Eco-fascist Obama Forces New Trucker Regulations
  
 History is in the making today as the Obama regime
has announced, for the first time ever, new regulations
for medium- and heavy-duty trucks regarding both fuel
economy requirements and emissions standards.
  
 The new standards are the result of a mandate first
set in motion in 2007 by Congress, and later by an
Executive Order issued by President Obama in May of
last year. The regulations will apply to medium and
heavy-duty trucks built in 2014 through 2018, aimed
at reducing annual national fuel consumption by 530
million barrels.
  
 The new regulations will be aimed at one of three
specific subsets of trucks: combination tractors
(commonly referred to as semi-trucks), heavy-duty
pickup trucks and vans and vocational vehicles.
  
 Each category will have its own regulations, but
the end goal is to reduce fuel consumption by as
much as 20 percent by 2018, which is the case for
semi-trucks.
  
 The category that will affect more than just freight
companies and large business owners, heavy-duty trucks
and vans, will require about a 15 percent improvement
in required fuel economy, although standards will be
unique based on fuel type.
  
 Vocational trucks, or delivery trucks, garbage trucks
and buses, will be mandated to reduce fuel consumption
by about 10 percent by 2018.
  
http://www.leftlanenews.com/obama-reveals-mediumheavy-duty-truck-epa-regulations-for-2014-2018.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(37) Eco-fascist Regulations to Shut Down 40 Percent
of Nation�s Electricity
  
http://wealthydebates.com/obama-regulations-to-shut-down-40-percent-of-nations-electricity/
  
 Obama administration regulations could force power
plants that make 40 percent of the nation�s electricity
to shut down.
  
 At issue are EPA restrictions on emissions that would
close hundreds of coal-burning power plants which
represent around 40 percent of the nation�s electricity.
  
 If that wasn�t bad enough, some observers think the
regulations could double electricity rates for average
households. The rates would increase because utilities
would have to pass the cost onto ratepayers of replacing
coal burning power plants or modernizing them to comply
with the regulations.
  
 The EPA rules � Carbon Pollution Standards for New Power
Plants � are part of Obama�s plan to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions which the agency says contribute to global
warming.
  
Obama Admitted Plan Would Raise Electricity Rates
  
 There is some evidence that President Obama has a
deliberate strategy of increasing electricity rates and
destroying the coal industry.
  
 �Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity
rates would necessarily skyrocket,� Obama told the editorial
board of The San Francisco Chronicle in 2008. �Even
regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or
bad. Because I�m capping greenhouse gases, coal power
plants, you know, natural gas, you name it � whatever
the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would
have to, retrofit their operations. That will cost money.
They will pass that money on to consumers.�
  
 �So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant,
they can; it�s just that it will bankrupt them,� Obama
said, �because they�re going to be charged a huge sum for
all that greenhouse gas that�s being emitted.�
  
 Obama�s prediction about coal plants have been proven
true. As Off The Grid News previously reported, in October
2013, FirstEnergy Corp announced that it would shut down
two coal-fired powered plants in Pennsylvania because it
said the cost of complying with EPA regulations was too high.
  
 Reuters estimated that coal-burning power plants capable
of generating 15,000 megawatts of electricity have shut
down since Obama took office in 2009. The news service
also estimates that power plants that generate around
37,000 megawatts of power will close in the next 10
years. One megawatt can provide electricity to up to
about 1,000 homes.
  
Awfully Expensive Electricity
  
 Those plants will be closing at a time when demand for
electricity is increasing. That will force utilities to
build power plants that burn other fuels such as natural
gas. It will add additional cost to electricity rates at
a time when the rates are already going up dramatically.
  
 �It could get awfully expensive,� Daniel Simmons of the
Institute for Energy Research told World Net Daily. �Some
people might see their electricity rates double. If there�s
no backup power plants, that means electricity is going to
get awfully expensive when you have shortages around the
country.
  
Another Obama Plan To Raise Your Electric Bill
  
 �We�re talking about dramatically increasing the cost of
electricity all to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. I
think that is the real goal,� Simmons said.
  
 Another Obama administration plan to reduce greenhouse
emissions, Carbon Capture and Sequestration, or CSS technology,
could raise electricity costs even more, Simmons predicted.
He noted that a an experimental CSS power plant in the
United States will cost an estimated $4.3 billion to build
and the EPA doesn�t know if the technology would work.
  
 �The technology is awfully expensive because it hasn�t
been tried anywhere, and that�s to try to capture the
carbon dioxide as it comes out after they burn the coal.�
Simmons said of CSS.
  
 CSS involves the use of filters to divert carbon emissions
from the air � and every taxpaying American will pay. The
CSS plants under construction will require $300 million in
taxpayer subsidies.
  
 US Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia has been critical
of the Obama administration�s policy on coal.
  
 �This Administration is trying to hold the coal industry
to impossible standards,� Manchin said. �Never before has
the federal government forced an industry to do something
that is technologically impossible. Forcing coal to meet
nearly the same emissions standards as gas when experts
know that the required technology is not operational on
a commercial scale makes absolutely no sense and will have
devastating impacts to the coal industry and our economy.�
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(38) Obama Admits Climate Agenda Has NOTHING To Do With
�Global Warming� (It�s About Government Control Stupid!)
  
 Dictatorships always desire to control and ration
countries� natural resources and now it�s happening
right here, in America.
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/23/obama-admits-his-climate-agenda-wont-curb-global-warming/
  
 President Barack Obama admitted in an interview with
The New Yorker that his plan to lower US carbon dioxide
emissions by banning new coal plants would do little to
curb global warming since developing countries like
China and India will still use coal power.
  
 The Obama administration published its proposed
carbon dioxide emissions limits for new coal plants
which would effectively ban coal power. That is,
unless they use commercially unproven carbon capture
and storage (CCS) technologies. Tighter emission
controls for coal plants are part of Obama�s plan
to fight global warming.
  
 Critics of the administration argue that banning
coal plants won�t curb global warming because
developing countries continue to build coal plants,
frustrating US efforts to lower global carbon emissions.
Obama conceded that fact, but argued that limiting
emissions here will only help the US because other
countries will come to us for the technology once
we�ve developed it.
  
 �And so if we can figure out a carbon-capture mechanism
that is sufficiently advanced and works, then we are
helping ourselves, because the Chinese and the Indians
are going to build some coal plants, and even if we
don�t build another coal plant in this country, there
are going to be a lot of coal plants around the world
that are built,� Obama told the New Yorker.
  
 �And we have a huge investment in trying to figure
out how we can help them do it more cleanly,� he added.
  
 Obama hopes that by requiring new US coal plants to
use CCS technologies, the country could become a world
leader and export the technology abroad when other
nations can afford it. If the US doesn�t lead, Obama
argues, other countries will not follow.
  
 �And it�s not sufficient for us to just tell them to
stop,� Obama said. �We�re going to have to give them
some help. We�re going to have to take some of our
research and development on things like clean-coal
technology and be able to export it to them or license
it to them� There�s going to be a process where we
help them leapfrog some of the development stages
that we went through.�
  
 �This is why I�m putting a big priority on our carbon
action plan here. It�s not because I�m ignorant of the
fact that these emerging countries are going to be a
bigger problem than us,� Obama added. �It�s because
it�s very hard for me to get in that conversation if
we�re making no effort. And it�s not an answer for us
to say, �Well, since the Chinese and the Indians are
the bigger problem, we might as well not even bother.��
  
 Indeed, countries like China and India are set to
ramp up their coal use dramatically. The World Resource
Institute reports that 76 percent of the proposed
coal-fired capacity is in India and China � nearly
1,200 coal plants have been proposed globally, totaling
more than 1.4 million megawatts of power.
  
 The Chinese greenlit 100 million metric tons of new
coal production capacity last year as part of the
government�s plan to bring 860 million metric tons
of coal production online by 2015.
  
 The US coal industry, however, says CCS is not yet
proven technology as there are no commercial-scale
coal plants in the country that uses the technology.
In fact, when the Environmental Protection Agency
wrote its rule limiting coal plant emissions it only
cited CCS projects that were government funded and
not in operation.
  
 �It is disingenuous to state that the technology is
�ready,�� said Charles McConnell, former assistant
secretary of energy in Obama. �Studies have verified
that implementation of [CSS] technology is necessary
to comply with EPA�s proposed [EPA carbon-emissions
limits] regulation and meet the [greenhouse gas]
targets necessary for limiting CO2 emissions to our
atmosphere.�
  
 �However, commercial [CSS] technology currently is
not available to meet EPA�s proposed rule. The cost
of current CO2 capture technology is much too high
to be commercially viable,� said McConnell, who now
serves as the executive director of the Energy &
Environment Initiative at Rice University.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(39) Eco-fascist Governments Love to Steal Property
  
 The builder of a fantastical fortress in the Mojave
Desert has been sentenced to jail for failing to pay
for the demolition of his life�s work. Why art isn�t
sacred in the eyes of code enforcers.
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonehenge_West
  
 The bearded builder of Phonehenge West, a structure
that became a famed piece of Mojave Desert folk art,
is heading to jail after a Los Angeles County judge
found he wasn�t paying enough toward the demolition
of the fortress.
  
 Los Angeles County charged builder Alan Kimble Fahey
$82,000 last year to demolish the structure, which
included a 70-foot tower, stained-glass windows, a
working windmill, and a replica of a Viking house
in Antelope Valley, some 50 miles north of Los Angeles.
This week, LA County Superior Court Judge Daviann
Mitchell sentenced him to 539 days in jail after
raising doubts about his inability to make payments
on the bill.
  
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2012/1222/Phonehenge-West-creator-jailed-When-folk-art-and-building-codes-collide
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(40) Eco-fascists Call for Ban on E-Cigarettes
  
 Several eco-fascist senators and a congressman want
electronic cigarettes banned on the US Capitol grounds.
  
 In a letter sent yesterday to the House Office
Building Commission and the Senate Committee on
Rules, Dick Durbin, Richard Blumenthal, Sherrod Brown,
Ed Markey, Tom Harkin and Barbara Boxer, along with
retiring Rep. Henry Waxman, said that e-cigarettes
should be treated the same way as cigarettes. The
latter are currently banned at the Capitol, nearby
office buildings, and within 25 feet of the entrance
of those buildings.
  
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/05/democrats_call_for_ban_on_e-cigarettes_on_capitol_121470.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(41) Eco-fascist �Officials� Deny Farmers Water
  
 California officials announced last week they will
not send any water from the state�s vast reservoir
system to local agencies this spring, the first time
that has happened in the 54-year history of the
State Water Project. State Department of Water
Resources Director Mark Cowin said there simply is
not enough water in the system to meet the needs
of farmers, cities and the �conservation efforts.�
  
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/01/31/dwr-cuts-allocations-to-organizations-buying-water-from-the-state/
  
UPDATE! SAVE THE FAMILIES FROM THOSE ECO-FASCISTS!
  
 Men, women and children could die because arrogant
politicians are not allowing water access to family
farmers - which should be considered a crime against
basic human rights.
  
Jerry Brown has exposed himself as an Eco-fascist.
  
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/02/03/gov-jerry-brown-calls-congress-drought-bill-unwelcome-and-divisive/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(42) New Eco-fascist Regulations to Skyrocket
Electric Bills
  
http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/doe-coal-regs-hike-price-electricity-70-80
  
 During the House hearing, �Department of Energy
Oversight: Status of Clean Coal Programs,� Joe Barton
(R-Texas) asked Dr. Julio Friedmann, the deputy
assistant secretary for clean coal at the Department
of Energy, about the additional costs carbon capture
and storage technology would bring to coal plants.
  
 �My generic question is pretty straightforward. All
of these carbon capture sequestration technologies
- add cost to these coal plants could y�all give
the committee, or the subcommittee, kind of a
baseline estimate of how much it adds to the cost,
does it double the cost, does it increase it by
25%, 50%, what�s the generic estimate?� Barton asked.
  
 �The precise number will vary by plant, whether it�s
sub-critical or supercritical, by coal rank, and by
the kind of technology used,� said Friedman.
  
 Concerning the first generation of carbon capture
and storage (CCS) technology to be implemented,
Friedman added �we�re looking at something on the
order of $70-90 a ton. In that context, that looks
something like a 70-80% increase on the wholesale
price of electricity.�
  
 In short, that�s a knife to the throat for the
American middle class.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(43) Eco-fascist Corporations Begin to Shut Off
Electricity to Political Activists� Homes
  
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/02/utilities-desperate-to-quash-dissent.html
  
 On the heels of Northeast Utilities admitting that
smart meters are �irrational�, we�re seeing the wheels
of reason and logic further come off the centralized
energy cart(el).
  
 In what is an illegal and thinly-veiled �psy-op�
(psychological operation) attempting to stem the
rising tide of awareness of the massive rights
violations associated with their �smart� meter
deployments, Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative
(PSREC) actually disconnected the electricity from
the home of Joshua Hart, a leader in the movement
and director of StopSmartMeters.org.
  
http://stopsmartmeters.org/2014/02/19/disconnected/
  
 As documented in our boat-rocking film Take Back Your
Power, so-called �smart� meter deployments are beleagured
on many levels, being linked to in-home surveillance,
unjustified billing increases, extortive �opt-out�
practices/fees, home and appliance hackability, health
symptoms (from pulsed microwave radiation and high-frequency
voltage transients), and a rather long list of home fires.
  
 Like hundreds of thousands, perhaps upwards of a
million now in Western countries, Hart is choosing to
not have a �smart� meter installed, preferring to not
to have his living quarters be surveiled, irradiated
or made easily hackable. And like many, he is not
contributing to his utility�s Punitive Opt-Out Fund
for the insolence of exercising constitutional and
human right. (There are many ways to retain your right
and not pay a fee or penalty for doing so � we have
written about one such method here. Under no
circumstances are you obligated to pay a fee to keep
your analog meter, though writing a well-written
notice via registered mail is often required.)
  
 Joshua Hart said on his website: �This is the first
disconnect by PSREC for failure to pay �opt out� fees.
No one in PG&E/ SCE/ SDG&E areas of California have
been disconnected solely for refusal to pay �opt out�
fees, and thousands have been ignoring toothless
disconnect warnings and deducting the fees from their
bill every month.  Why are utilities going to such
lengths to silence critics of their smart meter
policies?�
  
 So-called �smart� meters are not UL approved and have
never been safety-tested.  But according to grid
engineering firms such as Raab Associates they are
part of a technology roadmap which includes �mining
data for intel� purposes, and �data mining and
analytics� becoming core competency. What�s perhaps
even more troubling is the connection between �smart�
meters and military R&D funding.
  
 Thank goodness that huge numbers of people are
realizing that, yes, our government is so corrupt,
they would actually do deploy such technology upon
their own people.  Nipping the cognitive dissonance
squarely in the bud is the starting point for things
to change for the better.
  
 Of government/corporatist/utility desire to maintain
domination over their awakening customers, when
pondering the latest PR stunts, the word �desperation�
doth cometh to mind.
  
 And when you watch the below video of PSREC�s General
Manager Bob Marshall fighting with his conscience,
you have to wonder how much he got paid off to
disconnect, photograph and stalk Joshua Hart and
his family.  In an absurd demonstration of doublespeak
-cronyism, Marshall actually accuses the individual
whose electricity he illegally disconnected of being
the bully. See for yourself:
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33cjPZepb9c
  
Mirror here � http://upload.83.io/player.php?id=2192565
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(44) EPA Gestapo Will Not Allow Prosperous Opportunity ::
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/28/epa-moves-against-major-alaska-gold-mine-could-sideline-project-over-salmon/
  
 The EPA gestapo on Friday moved against a massive mine
project in Alaska which supporters say could contain
billions of dollars in gold and copper, delivering a
win for �environmentalists� who claimed the mine could
endanger sockeye salmon populations.
  
 The decision on Pebble Mine was highly anticipated,
and comes after an EPA report in January found
large-scale mining in the Bristol Bay watershed posed
significant risk to salmon and could adversely affect
Alaska Natives in the region, whose culture is built
around salmon.
  
 The gestapo will now examine whether to block or
otherwise restrict the mine project. But that decision
alone promises to significantly delay the project;
whether the EPA decides to bar construction entirely
remains to be seen.
  
 The action, announced Friday, is what supporters of
the proposed Pebble Mine have feared. Backers have
claimed the project could yield more than 100 million
ounces of gold, 80 billion pounds of copper and other
precious minerals. Companies have spent millions
researching and monitoring the area in an effort to
assure the EPA the mine would not cause ecological
damage.
  
 It�s well over due for some class-action lawsuits
against this gestapo who consistently interferes in
just about everything in today�s society.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(45) Court Rules Off-The-Grid Living Is Illegal
  
 Speronis disconnected all the utilities from her
modest home in Cape Coral for an experiment in
off-the-grid living some time ago. City officials
(known as eco-fascist gestapo) ignored her
activities until she went public and discussed
them with Liza Fernandez, a reporter for a local
TV station. A code enforcement officer designated
Speronis�s home as uninhabitable and gave her an
eviction notice a day after the piece aired. ...
  
http://www.offthegridnews.com/2014/02/22/court-rules-off-the-grid-living-is-illegal/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
Submit a correction or amendment below. (click here to make a fresh posting)
After submitting an amendment, you'll be able to view the differences between the old and new posts easily.
Syntax Highlighting:
To highlight particular lines, prefix each line with @@
Pressing TAB inserts 3 spaces
Paste Name
How long should your post be retained?
a day a month forever
Password (Optional)
pastebin - collaborative debugging

Recent Posts

Posted by TRACKING ECO-FAS on March Sun 16th 8:10 PM - Never Expires
download | new post

pastebin - collaborative debugging

Recent Posts

Posted by TRACKING ECO-FAS on March Sun 16th 8:10 PM - Never Expiresdownload | new post

Posted by TRACKING ECO-FAS on March Sun 16th 8:10 PM - Never Expires
download | new post
