TRACKING ECO-FASCIST TRENDS 0011 SO WHAT IS ECO-FASCISM? (1) The Very Definition of Eco-fascism http://www.infowars.com/environmental-fascism-the-ecofascists-are-slowly-but-surely-taking-over-america/ (2) Stacy Lynne Exposes Eco-Fascist Abuse Eco-fascists will do whatever it takes to shut you up - including violations against human rights. http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Hodges/2013/12/Hodges_1_121513_210000.mp3 http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Hodges/2013/12/Hodges_3_121513_230000.mp3 http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Hodges/2013/06/Hodges_3_060213_230000.mp3 (3) Why is Everyone Talking About UN Agenda 21? http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/uploads/4/4/6/6/4466371/why_is_everyone_talking_about_un_agenda_21.pdf (4) MIT Professor ; It’s About “Crony Capitalism” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhEdTW7hPRs Mirror here » http://fileb.ag/wikdc7hyvtkx AND HOW DOES ECO-FASCISM EFFECT POPULATIONS? (5) “We need to reduce consumption by 80%!” http://www.iclei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ICLEI_WS/Documents/events/gth/presentations/ICLEI_GTH_ICLEIeuropeansecretariat_20130412.pdf Mirror here » http://fileb.ag/gkeagsv1odmf (6) The Redistribution of Consumption http://www.thecommentator.com/article/1147/and_now_the_redistribution_of_consumption (7) The Growing Threat of an Economic Tyranny http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_323_32177.php (8) Obama Promises to Bankrupt US Coal Industry http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw Mirror here » http://fileb.ag/ivrkhbsxxf4h (9) THE SECRET BEHIND THE “ENVIRONMENTAL” AGENDA, NATURAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION TO THE SUPER RICH! http://www.buildfreedom.com/news/archive.php?id=4411 (10) Neighborhood Property Seized ... FOR NOTHING http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/kelo-revisited_776021.html HOW HAVE ECO-FASCISTS EFFECTED PEOPLE SO FAR? (11) How Dare You Wash Cars for Money!? http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/high-school-cheerleader-car-wash-violates-environmental-laws/ (12) How Dare You Plant a Vegetable Garden!? http://www.infowars.com/florida-couple-sues-city-after-being-forced-to-uproot-family-vegetable-garden/ (13) How Dare You Use an Old Wood Stove!? http://www.independentsentinel.com/epa-bans-most-wood-burning-stoves-in-a-corrupt-scheme-fireplaces-next/ (14) How Dare You Use Old Electric Meters? http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/deferring-inevitable_781518.html (15) How Dare You Use Incandescent Lightbulbs!? http://reason.com/reasontv/2014/01/09/the-dumbest-new-ban-in-2014-incandescent (16) How Dare Gun Owners Buy Lead Ammunition!? http://www.nssfblog.com/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition-take-action-now/ (17) How Dare We Use Coal Powered Energy!? http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/energy/item/16250-obama-epa-war-on-coal-to-shut-200-coal-fired-plants-devastate-economy (18) How Dare We Use Plastic Bags!? http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Plastic-Bag-Ban-at-Large-Retail-Stores-Begins-in-Los-Angeles-Recyclable-Reusable--238356621.html (19) How Dare We Smoke Cigarretes!? http://voices.yahoo.com/smoking-ban-passed-illinois-lawmakers-325179.html (20) How Dare We Use Electronic Cigarretes!? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7ZRYctuzMU http://mashable.com/2013/12/19/new-york-city-adds-e-cigarettes-to-smoking-ban/ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/05/democrats_call_for_ban_on_e-cigarettes_on_capitol_121470.html (21) How Dare We Buy Heirloom Seeds!? http://truthstreammedia.com/eu-to-ban-heirloom-seeds-and-criminalize-unregistered-gardens/ (22) How Dare You Feed Wildlife!? http://govtslaves.info/jailed-without-bond-81-year-old-woman-left-birdseed-outside-animals-property/ (23) How Dare There Be Prosperity!? http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/21/un-global-prosperity-is-causing-global-warming/ http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/19/co2-emissions-outsourced-rich-nations-rising-economies (24) How Dare Kids Set Up a Lemonade Stand!? http://theweek.com/article/index/255939/whatrsquos-the-point-of-regulating-lemonade-stands (25) How Dare You Have Own Property!? http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/14/Wyoming-Suing-Obama-s-EPA-for-Stealing-1-Million-Acres-of-State-Property (26) How Dare You Collect Rainwater!? http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/illegality-of-rainwater-collection/ (27) Need Water? Tough Luck! http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/01/31/dwr-cuts-allocations-to-organizations-buying-water-from-the-state/ TRACKING THE TRENDS OF ECO-FASCISM! (28) Incandescent Ban to Bankrupt Bird Care Centre http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/incandescent-bulb-ban-leaves-bird-care-centre-with-dim-hope-1.2492890 Ottawa’s Wild Bird Care Centre has put the call out for incandescent light bulbs, which it uses to provide warmth for injured and recovering birds, after the federal government banned manufacturers from making the bulbs. In Canada, the more energy-efficient compact fluorescent light bulbs are considered the norm. The incandescent light bulbs use more power, but they are also warmer and serve an important role inside incubators. “As the light bulb is on, it will obviously warm things up and then the setting will turn it off to keep the right temperature,” explained Mireille Goguen, who works at the centre. She said they were caught off-guard by the bulb ban and they are already running short on incandescent bulbs. Now they are asking people to donate 100-watt bulbs. “(We will take) as many as possible. If people have them hanging around we will take them or if they want to buy them for us it would be much appreciated,” said Goguen. Donations can be dropped off at the centre, which is located on Moodie Drive in the city’s west end. _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (29) Plastic Bag Ban is a TAX SCAM http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Opponents-Slam-Proposed-Plastic-Bag-Ban-236474401.html Opponents of a proposed plastic bag ban gathered Wednesday to call on the San Diego City Council to abandon the plan to remove plastic bags from local stores. Community leaders, including Mark Arabo, president of the Neighborhood Market Association, held a press conference in front of Rainbow Market on Federal Boulevard in which they called the proposed ban a tax scam that will negatively impact working-class San Diegans. “This is a terrible plan. It’s terrible because the solution is worse than the so-called problem,” said Arabo. “It’s a classic case of politicians attempting to do something for the environment, in part to appease some environmental groups, without seeing the bigger picture.” The proposed ban would remove plastic bags from stores while imposing a paper bag tax on customers. Shoppers would be charged 10 cents for each paper bag they might need at a store. “This ban will have reaching ramifications. It’ll cost taxpayers – mothers, fathers and brothers – more money when they go shopping for groceries,” said Arabo. Though the ban is designed to reduce waste and help the environment, Arabo argued that plastic bags only make up one-third of one percent of the waste stream. On the other end of the plastic bag ban debate, Sherri Lightner, San Diego City Council President Pro Tem, District 1, supports the proposed ban. _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (30) Eco-fascists Want to Police Households http://www.chicoer.com/editorials/ci_24875035/editorial-toilet-police-dont-want-job The state mandates water-saving toilets and showers in all homes, but obviously didn’t think long about how to achieve that. First the city of Chico had the ban on nuclear weapons, then wood-burning stoves, then plastic bags. Now comes a ban on high-flow toilets. And if you think the city can’t enforce that, then you haven’t met the toilet police. OK, so the title “Toilet Police” probably doesn’t appear on any city worker’s business card, but that’s what they are. But let’s not blame city building inspectors for an odd law — or even the Chico City Council. For once, this ridiculous save-the-world concept doesn’t come from the council, but rather from the busybodies in the state Legislature. They passed a law that took effect Jan. 1 that requires water-conserving plumbing fixtures on any home built before 1994. How will that be enforced? Well, if a property has any work done that requires a building permit from a city or county, that entity’s inspector must verify that the home has low-flow toilets, showers and faucets. To make it even more disturbing, the low-flow inspection doesn’t occur if you’re getting plumbing work. It occurs if you’re getting any work that requires a building permit, such as getting a new heater, new windows or converting a garage into a den. Uh, maybe. So under the letter of the law, if a homeowner buys a new water heater or fireplace insert for a couple hundred dollars, he or she might spend considerably more than that converting all toilets, faucets and showerheads to low-flow devices. City and county building inspectors don’t want to be toilet police. We can’t imagine them wanting to spend time checking a person’s toilet when they’re there to check an air conditioner. They’re taking a loose interpretation of the law for now, and won’t inspect toilets during projects like repairs and maintenance that don’t involve plumbing. But there’s no guarantee the state, which passed the law, won’t require cities and counties to enforce a strict interpretation. With all the uncertainty, it entices a homeowner to ignore the government requirement to get a building permit for minor home improvement projects. Governments should be concerned if fewer people take out building permits. It means less revenue for cash-strapped local governments. The building industry is concerned that residents may put off rebuilding and home improvement projects because they would include this unwanted expense. With the building industry and contractors finally showing signs of recovery from the recession, we don’t want to see new obstacles. Once again the state passes a goofy law without thinking about the consequences, since somebody else has to enforce it. The city and county building departments urge residents not to be scared off by the new laws, to call and ask questions. It seems they are like the rest of us, trying to figure out how long they can ignore the fools in Sacramento before they get caught. _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (31) DOE Eco-fascists Roll Out Household Spy Grid DOE says its energy-scoring spyware - called the Home Energy Scoring Tool - is like a vehicle’s mile-per-gallon rating because it allows government to compare the energy performance of individual homes to other homes nationwide. It also provides homeowners with suggestions (or mandates, in the near future) for “improving their homes’ efficiency.” The software is part of the government’s effort to reduce the nation’s energy consumption; but it’s also billed as a way to keep home-retrofitting going, at a time when stimulus funds for weather-proofing have run out - you see, the federated fascists care more about spying on our energy consumption rather than providing weather-proof options for our homes. Read the rest of the “trendy” PR garbage here, http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/doe-plugs-energy-rating-homes-similar-mpg-rating-cars _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (32) “Sustainable Communities Investment Authority” Plan to Bulldoze Households for Corporate Projects http://benswann.com/californias-dangerous-idea-give-unelected-bureaucrats-the-power-to-confiscate-the-private-property-of-americans/ California’s Senate Bill 1 is what the founding fathers fought against. Straight from the UN Agenda 21’s playbook, SB1 will give power to a county to form a “Sustainable Communities Investment Authority” (SCIA). These Authorities have the power of eminent domain and can confiscate private property to build “sustainable communities.” The bill essentially paves the way for the loss of any true private property in California, resulting in the loss of freedom and driving down home values. If the Senate passes the modified bill, only Governor Jerry Brown (D – CA) will stand in its way of becoming law. This means that city and county governments can create unelected bureaucracies with the power to do what’s necessary to create “sustainable communities.” It also means that the definition of “blight” will change from the original definition of abandoned and decaying buildings on residential lots to a much wider definition including anything the bureaucracies need to create sustainable communities. Not only would the government be able to use eminent domain to procure land for public transportation, it could take private homes within half a mile of that public transportation in the name of creating a sustainable community. A private home is not really private if it could be taken at any time to create low income, low energy housing. According to Lawrence J. McQuillan, “each Authority will be granted powers to build “Sustainable Communities” means jamming people into dense, urban centers using high-density residential housing and high-intensity retail and commercial buildings near mass transit corridors. To that end, SB 1 will grant each Authority unprecedented powers.” Eminent domain has gradually grown to be one of the most oppressive government policies. Since the SCOTUS’ decision in Kelo v. City of New London, eminent domain continues to be the enemy of property owners. Homeowners have lost their homes to private development projects. People have been paid less for their land than they originally paid for it. Businesses have even been forced to sell their buildings to corporations. It has become perhaps the most clearly identifiable example of crony capitalism and corruption in the country. The government has failed to protect citizen’s natural rights: protecting life, liberty, and property. In 2011, citizens voiced outrage over the ideas presented by activists, environmentalists and private developers. Property owners are worried that Senate Bill 1 will pass and the threat of increased taxes and possible property confiscation will become a reality in California. Read the full analysis of Senate Bill 1. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_1_cfa_20130307_114042_sen_comm.html Sponsors ; Darrell Steinberg & Mark DeSaulnier http://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB1/2013 SB1 Declares Suburbs & Rural Areas “Blight” http://www.bayarealiberty.com/libertyblog/?page_id=942 _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (33) Eco-fascist Obama Forces New Trucker Regulations History is in the making today as the Obama regime has announced, for the first time ever, new regulations for medium- and heavy-duty trucks regarding both fuel economy requirements and emissions standards. The new standards are the result of a mandate first set in motion in 2007 by Congress, and later by an Executive Order issued by President Obama in May of last year. The regulations will apply to medium and heavy-duty trucks built in 2014 through 2018, aimed at reducing annual national fuel consumption by 530 million barrels. The new regulations will be aimed at one of three specific subsets of trucks: combination tractors (commonly referred to as semi-trucks), heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans and vocational vehicles. Each category will have its own regulations, but the end goal is to reduce fuel consumption by as much as 20 percent by 2018, which is the case for semi-trucks. The category that will affect more than just freight companies and large business owners, heavy-duty trucks and vans, will require about a 15 percent improvement in required fuel economy, although standards will be unique based on fuel type. Vocational trucks, or delivery trucks, garbage trucks and buses, will be mandated to reduce fuel consumption by about 10 percent by 2018. http://www.leftlanenews.com/obama-reveals-mediumheavy-duty-truck-epa-regulations-for-2014-2018.html _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (34) Eco-fascist Regulations to Shut Down 40 Percent of Nation’s Electricity http://wealthydebates.com/obama-regulations-to-shut-down-40-percent-of-nations-electricity/ Obama administration regulations could force power plants that make 40 percent of the nation’s electricity to shut down. At issue are EPA restrictions on emissions that would close hundreds of coal-burning power plants which represent around 40 percent of the nation’s electricity. If that wasn’t bad enough, some observers think the regulations could double electricity rates for average households. The rates would increase because utilities would have to pass the cost onto ratepayers of replacing coal burning power plants or modernizing them to comply with the regulations. The EPA rules — Carbon Pollution Standards for New Power Plants — are part of Obama’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions which the agency says contribute to global warming. Obama Admitted Plan Would Raise Electricity Rates There is some evidence that President Obama has a deliberate strategy of increasing electricity rates and destroying the coal industry. “Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” Obama told the editorial board of The San Francisco Chronicle in 2008. “Even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad. Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, you know, natural gas, you name it — whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to, retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.” “So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them,” Obama said, “because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.” Obama’s prediction about coal plants have been proven true. As Off The Grid News previously reported, in October 2013, FirstEnergy Corp announced that it would shut down two coal-fired powered plants in Pennsylvania because it said the cost of complying with EPA regulations was too high. Reuters estimated that coal-burning power plants capable of generating 15,000 megawatts of electricity have shut down since Obama took office in 2009. The news service also estimates that power plants that generate around 37,000 megawatts of power will close in the next 10 years. One megawatt can provide electricity to up to about 1,000 homes. Awfully Expensive Electricity Those plants will be closing at a time when demand for electricity is increasing. That will force utilities to build power plants that burn other fuels such as natural gas. It will add additional cost to electricity rates at a time when the rates are already going up dramatically. “It could get awfully expensive,” Daniel Simmons of the Institute for Energy Research told World Net Daily. “Some people might see their electricity rates double. If there’s no backup power plants, that means electricity is going to get awfully expensive when you have shortages around the country. Another Obama Plan To Raise Your Electric Bill “We’re talking about dramatically increasing the cost of electricity all to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. I think that is the real goal,” Simmons said. Another Obama administration plan to reduce greenhouse emissions, Carbon Capture and Sequestration, or CSS technology, could raise electricity costs even more, Simmons predicted. He noted that a an experimental CSS power plant in the United States will cost an estimated $4.3 billion to build and the EPA doesn’t know if the technology would work. “The technology is awfully expensive because it hasn’t been tried anywhere, and that’s to try to capture the carbon dioxide as it comes out after they burn the coal.” Simmons said of CSS. CSS involves the use of filters to divert carbon emissions from the air – and every taxpaying American will pay. The CSS plants under construction will require $300 million in taxpayer subsidies. US Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia has been critical of the Obama administration’s policy on coal. “This Administration is trying to hold the coal industry to impossible standards,” Manchin said. “Never before has the federal government forced an industry to do something that is technologically impossible. Forcing coal to meet nearly the same emissions standards as gas when experts know that the required technology is not operational on a commercial scale makes absolutely no sense and will have devastating impacts to the coal industry and our economy.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (35) Obama Admits Climate Agenda Has NOTHING To Do With “Global Warming” (It’s About Government Control Stupid!) Dictatorships always desire to control and ration countries’ natural resources and now it’s happening right here, in America. http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/23/obama-admits-his-climate-agenda-wont-curb-global-warming/ President Barack Obama admitted in an interview with The New Yorker that his plan to lower US carbon dioxide emissions by banning new coal plants would do little to curb global warming since developing countries like China and India will still use coal power. The Obama administration published its proposed carbon dioxide emissions limits for new coal plants which would effectively ban coal power. That is, unless they use commercially unproven carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. Tighter emission controls for coal plants are part of Obama’s plan to fight global warming. Critics of the administration argue that banning coal plants won’t curb global warming because developing countries continue to build coal plants, frustrating US efforts to lower global carbon emissions. Obama conceded that fact, but argued that limiting emissions here will only help the US because other countries will come to us for the technology once we’ve developed it. “And so if we can figure out a carbon-capture mechanism that is sufficiently advanced and works, then we are helping ourselves, because the Chinese and the Indians are going to build some coal plants, and even if we don’t build another coal plant in this country, there are going to be a lot of coal plants around the world that are built,” Obama told the New Yorker. “And we have a huge investment in trying to figure out how we can help them do it more cleanly,” he added. Obama hopes that by requiring new US coal plants to use CCS technologies, the country could become a world leader and export the technology abroad when other nations can afford it. If the US doesn’t lead, Obama argues, other countries will not follow. “And it’s not sufficient for us to just tell them to stop,” Obama said. “We’re going to have to give them some help. We’re going to have to take some of our research and development on things like clean-coal technology and be able to export it to them or license it to them… There’s going to be a process where we help them leapfrog some of the development stages that we went through.” “This is why I’m putting a big priority on our carbon action plan here. It’s not because I’m ignorant of the fact that these emerging countries are going to be a bigger problem than us,” Obama added. “It’s because it’s very hard for me to get in that conversation if we’re making no effort. And it’s not an answer for us to say, ‘Well, since the Chinese and the Indians are the bigger problem, we might as well not even bother.’” Indeed, countries like China and India are set to ramp up their coal use dramatically. The World Resource Institute reports that 76 percent of the proposed coal-fired capacity is in India and China — nearly 1,200 coal plants have been proposed globally, totaling more than 1.4 million megawatts of power. The Chinese greenlit 100 million metric tons of new coal production capacity last year as part of the government’s plan to bring 860 million metric tons of coal production online by 2015. The US coal industry, however, says CCS is not yet proven technology as there are no commercial-scale coal plants in the country that uses the technology. In fact, when the Environmental Protection Agency wrote its rule limiting coal plant emissions it only cited CCS projects that were government funded and not in operation. “It is disingenuous to state that the technology is ‘ready,’” said Charles McConnell, former assistant secretary of energy in Obama. “Studies have verified that implementation of [CSS] technology is necessary to comply with EPA’s proposed [EPA carbon-emissions limits] regulation and meet the [greenhouse gas] targets necessary for limiting CO2 emissions to our atmosphere.” “However, commercial [CSS] technology currently is not available to meet EPA’s proposed rule. The cost of current CO2 capture technology is much too high to be commercially viable,” said McConnell, who now serves as the executive director of the Energy & Environment Initiative at Rice University. _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (36) Eco-fascist Governments Love to Steal Property The builder of a fantastical fortress in the Mojave Desert has been sentenced to jail for failing to pay for the demolition of his life’s work. Why art isn’t sacred in the eyes of code enforcers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonehenge_West The bearded builder of Phonehenge West, a structure that became a famed piece of Mojave Desert folk art, is heading to jail after a Los Angeles County judge found he wasn’t paying enough toward the demolition of the fortress. Los Angeles County charged builder Alan Kimble Fahey $82,000 last year to demolish the structure, which included a 70-foot tower, stained-glass windows, a working windmill, and a replica of a Viking house in Antelope Valley, some 50 miles north of Los Angeles. This week, LA County Superior Court Judge Daviann Mitchell sentenced him to 539 days in jail after raising doubts about his inability to make payments on the bill. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2012/1222/Phonehenge-West-creator-jailed-When-folk-art-and-building-codes-collide _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (37) Eco-fascists Call for Ban on E-Cigarettes Several eco-fascist senators and a congressman want electronic cigarettes banned on the US Capitol grounds. In a letter sent yesterday to the House Office Building Commission and the Senate Committee on Rules, Dick Durbin, Richard Blumenthal, Sherrod Brown, Ed Markey, Tom Harkin and Barbara Boxer, along with retiring Rep. Henry Waxman, said that e-cigarettes should be treated the same way as cigarettes. The latter are currently banned at the Capitol, nearby office buildings, and within 25 feet of the entrance of those buildings. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/05/democrats_call_for_ban_on_e-cigarettes_on_capitol_121470.html _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (38) Eco-fascist “Officials” Deny Farmers Water California officials announced last week they will not send any water from the state’s vast reservoir system to local agencies this spring, the first time that has happened in the 54-year history of the State Water Project. State Department of Water Resources Director Mark Cowin said there simply is not enough water in the system to meet the needs of farmers, cities and the “conservation efforts.” http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/01/31/dwr-cuts-allocations-to-organizations-buying-water-from-the-state/ UPDATE! SAVE THE FAMILIES FROM THOSE ECO-FASCISTS! Men, women and children could die because arrogant politicians are not allowing water access to family farmers - which should be considered a crime against basic human rights. Jerry Brown has exposed himself as an Eco-fascist. http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/02/03/gov-jerry-brown-calls-congress-drought-bill-unwelcome-and-divisive/ _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (39) New Eco-fascist Regulations to Skyrocket Electric Bills http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/doe-coal-regs-hike-price-electricity-70-80 During the House hearing, “Department of Energy Oversight: Status of Clean Coal Programs,” Joe Barton (R-Texas) asked Dr. Julio Friedmann, the deputy assistant secretary for clean coal at the Department of Energy, about the additional costs carbon capture and storage technology would bring to coal plants. “My generic question is pretty straightforward. All of these carbon capture sequestration technologies - add cost to these coal plants could y’all give the committee, or the subcommittee, kind of a baseline estimate of how much it adds to the cost, does it double the cost, does it increase it by 25%, 50%, what’s the generic estimate?” Barton asked. “The precise number will vary by plant, whether it’s sub-critical or supercritical, by coal rank, and by the kind of technology used,” said Friedman. Concerning the first generation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to be implemented, Friedman added “we’re looking at something on the order of $70-90 a ton. In that context, that looks something like a 70-80% increase on the wholesale price of electricity.” In short, that’s a knife to the throat for the American middle class. _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ (40) Eco-fascist Corporations Begin to Shut Off Electricity to Political Activists’ Homes http://www.activistpost.com/2014/02/utilities-desperate-to-quash-dissent.html On the heels of Northeast Utilities admitting that smart meters are “irrational”, we’re seeing the wheels of reason and logic further come off the centralized energy cart(el). In what is an illegal and thinly-veiled “psy-op” (psychological operation) attempting to stem the rising tide of awareness of the massive rights violations associated with their ‘smart’ meter deployments, Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative (PSREC) actually disconnected the electricity from the home of Joshua Hart, a leader in the movement and director of StopSmartMeters.org. http://stopsmartmeters.org/2014/02/19/disconnected/ As documented in our boat-rocking film Take Back Your Power, so-called ‘smart’ meter deployments are beleagured on many levels, being linked to in-home surveillance, unjustified billing increases, extortive “opt-out” practices/fees, home and appliance hackability, health symptoms (from pulsed microwave radiation and high-frequency voltage transients), and a rather long list of home fires. Like hundreds of thousands, perhaps upwards of a million now in Western countries, Hart is choosing to not have a ‘smart’ meter installed, preferring to not to have his living quarters be surveiled, irradiated or made easily hackable. And like many, he is not contributing to his utility’s Punitive Opt-Out Fund for the insolence of exercising constitutional and human right. (There are many ways to retain your right and not pay a fee or penalty for doing so — we have written about one such method here. Under no circumstances are you obligated to pay a fee to keep your analog meter, though writing a well-written notice via registered mail is often required.) Joshua Hart said on his website: “This is the first disconnect by PSREC for failure to pay ‘opt out’ fees. No one in PG&E/ SCE/ SDG&E areas of California have been disconnected solely for refusal to pay ‘opt out’ fees, and thousands have been ignoring toothless disconnect warnings and deducting the fees from their bill every month. Why are utilities going to such lengths to silence critics of their smart meter policies?” So-called ‘smart’ meters are not UL approved and have never been safety-tested. But according to grid engineering firms such as Raab Associates they are part of a technology roadmap which includes “mining data for intel” purposes, and “data mining and analytics” becoming core competency. What’s perhaps even more troubling is the connection between ‘smart’ meters and military R&D funding. Thank goodness that huge numbers of people are realizing that, yes, our government is so corrupt, they would actually do deploy such technology upon their own people. Nipping the cognitive dissonance squarely in the bud is the starting point for things to change for the better. Of government/corporatist/utility desire to maintain domination over their awakening customers, when pondering the latest PR stunts, the word “desperation” doth cometh to mind. And when you watch the below video of PSREC’s General Manager Bob Marshall fighting with his conscience, you have to wonder how much he got paid off to disconnect, photograph and stalk Joshua Hart and his family. In an absurd demonstration of doublespeak -cronyism, Marshall actually accuses the individual whose electricity he illegally disconnected of being the bully. See for yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33cjPZepb9c Mirror here » http://upload.83.io/player.php?id=2192565 _________________________________________________ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ n3tBin

pastebin - collaborative debugging

pastebin is a collaborative debugging tool allowing you to share and modify code snippets while chatting on IRC, IM or a message board.

This site is developed to XHTML and CSS2 W3C standards. If you see this paragraph, your browser does not support those standards and you need to upgrade. Visit WaSP for a variety of options.

n3tBin / Home / Archive

Copyright © 2007-2011, n3t-t3z Team

Syntax Highlighting:
To highlight particular lines, prefix each line with @@
Pressing TAB inserts 3 spaces