Posted by eco on March Tue 17th 5:27 PM - Never Expires
download | new post

TRACKING ECO-FASCIST TRENDS 0028
    
    
 �This intriguing development is very much a part of the
globalist restructuring of our world in the name of private
profit and corporate despotism. This is another way in which
private corporations are working hand in hand with local
government to enslave the people and remove, arrest, charge
and perhaps even beat or kill anyone who gets in the way of
private profit.� WELCOME TO NIGHTMARE THAT IS �AGENDA 21�
  
  
WHAT IS ECO-FASCISM?
  
(1) The Very Definition of Eco-fascism
  
http://www.infowars.com/environmental-fascism-the-ecofascists-are-slowly-but-surely-taking-over-america/
  
(2) Dr. Patrick Moore Exposes Hysteria Surrounding Global Warming
  
 In this episode of the Lions of Liberty Podcast, host Marc Clair
welcomes in co-founder of Greenpeace, Dr. Patrick Moore! Dr. Moore
describes how he first became interested in the science of ecology,
and how his concern with environmental destruction led him to
co-found Greenpeace. Marc discusses with Dr. Moore just why he
left Greenpeace, and gets into some of the ideological issues he
has with many aspects of the environmental movement today. Dr. Moore
goes on to explain the problems he sees with the hysteria surrounding
global warming and climate change, and how he sees the future of
energy unfolding.
  
http://lionsoflibertypodcast.podbean.com/mf/web/sipcmn/LOLPEp45PatrickMoore.mp3
  
(3) Why is Everyone Talking About UN Agenda 21?
  
http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/uploads/4/4/6/6/4466371/why_is_everyone_talking_about_un_agenda_21.pdf
  
(4) MIT Professor ; It�s About �Crony Capitalism�
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhEdTW7hPRs
  
Mirror here � http://upsto.re/tFv3a9
  
  
AND HOW DOES ECO-FASCISM EFFECT POPULATIONS?
  
(5) Ways Government Keeps Native Americans In Poverty
  
 If governments and their corporate-masters had their
way, everyone would be forced to live in federalized
�preservations� where every aspect of life is audited.
  
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/03/13/5-ways-the-government-keeps-native-americans-in-poverty/
  
(6) �We need to reduce consumption by 80%!�
  
http://www.iclei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ICLEI_WS/Documents/events/gth/presentations/ICLEI_GTH_ICLEIeuropeansecretariat_20130412.pdf
  
Mirror here � http://fileb.ag/gkeagsv1odmf
  
(7) The Redistribution of Consumption
  
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/1147/and_now_the_redistribution_of_consumption
  
(8) The Growing Threat of an Economic Tyranny
  
http://www.infowars.com/hollow-justice-and-courts-of-order-in-an-age-of-government-sanctioned-tyranny/
  
(9) Obama Promises to Bankrupt US Coal Industry
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw
  
Mirror here � http://f.lui.li/get_1506_4f4d.html
  
(10) THE SECRET BEHIND THE �ENVIRONMENTAL� AGENDA,
NATURAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION TO THE SUPER RICH!
  
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/08/06/374307/wall-streets-unprecedented-land-grab/
  
(11) Neighborhood Property Seized ... FOR NOTHING
  
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/kelo-revisited_776021.html
  
(12) ARMED ECO-FASCIST GESTAPO BEING USED TO CONFISCATE
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO LEASE FOR CORPORATE ENERGY PROJECTS!
  
 The Bureau of Land Management�s eco-fascist gestapo is
stealing American property and livestock. In attempt to
rationalize their theft, they claim they will �save the
tortoise.� The BLM is using environmentalism to confuse
people to condone their theft of private property - yet
the BLM cashed in with $1.27 million for fracking leases
in Nevada!
  
http://www.naturalnews.com/044670_BLM_lies_fracking_leases_Bundy_ranch.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Petroleum-Data-Clark-County-Nevada.pdf
http://m.shalereporter.com/industry/article_0de547ba-8ca4-11e2-ab4e-0019bb30f31a.html
http://www.8newsnow.com/story/4877010/nevadas-hidden-treasure-black-gold
  
 Similar to the Natural News investigation, Infowars has
found and mirrored some evidence also confirming the BLM is
being used to confiscate public property for new solar power
generation facilities as well. Harry Reid and his oldest son,
Rory are both involved in an effort by a Chinese energy giant,
ENN Energy Group, to build a $5 billion solar farm and panel
manufacturing plant on private property. Rory Reid was the
chief representative for the Chinese energy firm.
  
http://www.infowars.com/breaking-sen-harry-reid-behind-blm-land-grab-of-bundy-ranch/
http://www.infowars.com/feds-back-down-from-bundy-siege-after-infowars-expose-of-chinese-land-grab/
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/reid-smelling-anything-but-rosy-in-ranch-fight/
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/04/Harry-Reid-s-Son-Representing-Chinese-Solar-Panel-Plant-In-5-Billion-Nevada-Deal
  
(13) The EPA Wants To Kill Organic Food Production
  
http://livegreatfeelgreat.com/2014/06/epa-expand-use-bee-killing-pesticides/
  
http://www.naturalnews.com/047753_deadly_herbicide_environmental_groups_EPA.html
  
(14) Vets Died as VA Obsessed Over Renewable �Green� Energy
  
The sick and halt wait but the solar panels don�t.
  
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/19/editorial-strange-priorities-at-the-va/  
  
  
HOW HAVE ECO-FASCISTS TRASHED HUMAN RIGHTS SO FAR?
    
(15) How Dare Kids Build Tree Forts!?
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX-u_fzIMFw
http://www.infowars.com/cop-pulls-gun-on-fifth-graders-building-tree-fort/
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/04/06/georgia-cop-pulls-gun-on-black-children-because-building-a-tree-house-is-hazardous/
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/government-tells-california-family-scale-back-your-treehouse
  
(16) How Dare You Wash Cars for Money!?
  
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/high-school-cheerleader-car-wash-violates-environmental-laws/
http://survivalbackpack.us/city-bans-washing-cars-driveway/
  
(17) How Dare You Plant a Vegetable Garden!?
  
http://www.infowars.com/florida-couple-sues-city-after-being-forced-to-uproot-family-vegetable-garden/
http://www.offthegridnews.com/2013/11/23/city-forces-couple-to-uproot-17-year-old-organic-garden/
http://survivalbackpack.us/fda-ban-organic-farming/
http://wearechange.org/swat-team-raids-organic-farm-confiscates-blueberries/
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/indiana-ginseng-harvest-crackdown/
  
(18) How Dare You Use an Old Wood Stove!?
  
http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-12/documents/proposed_requirements_for_wood_stoves_and_pellet_stoves.pdf%20
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17776-epa-wants-to-snuff-out-wood-and-pellet-stoves
http://www.independentsentinel.com/epa-bans-most-wood-burning-stoves-in-a-corrupt-scheme-fireplaces-next/
http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/the-epa-takes-an-ax-to-self-sufficiency-most-woodburning-stoves-will-soon-be-illegal-09282013
  
(19) How Dare You Use Old Electric Meters!?
  
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/deferring-inevitable_781518.html
  
(20) How Dare You Use Old Electrical Appliances!?
  
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11061538/EU-to-ban-high-energy-hair-dryers-smartphones-and-kettles.html
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/eu-bans-high-powered-vacuum-cleaners/
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/themargin/2014/08/21/eu-kicks-up-dust-with-a-ban-on-vacuum-cleaners-that-sucks/
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/eu-bans-good-vacuum-cleaners-next-big-kettles-hot-irons/
  
(21) How Dare You Use Incandescent Lightbulbs!?
  
http://reason.com/reasontv/2014/01/09/the-dumbest-new-ban-in-2014-incandescent
  
(22) How Dare Gun Owners Buy Lead Ammunition!?
  
http://www.nssfblog.com/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition-take-action-now/
  
(23) How Dare We Use Coal Powered Energy!?
  
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/energy/item/16250-obama-epa-war-on-coal-to-shut-200-coal-fired-plants-devastate-economy
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/obamas-epa-coal-regulations-increasing-natural-gas-prices-150/
http://govtslaves.info/high-prices-shortages-follow-new-epa-mandate/
  
(24) How Dare We Use Plastic Bags!?
  
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Plastic-Bag-Ban-at-Large-Retail-Stores-Begins-in-Los-Angeles-Recyclable-Reusable--238356621.html
  
(25) How Dare We Smoke Cigarretes!?
  
http://voices.yahoo.com/smoking-ban-passed-illinois-lawmakers-325179.html
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TOWN_VS_TOBACCO
  
(26) How Dare We Use Electronic Cigarretes!?
  
http://lionsofliberty.com/2014/08/27/tmr-2014-08-27/
http://mashable.com/2013/12/19/new-york-city-adds-e-cigarettes-to-smoking-ban/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/05/democrats_call_for_ban_on_e-cigarettes_on_capitol_121470.html
  
(27) How Dare We Buy Heirloom Seeds!?
  
http://truthstreammedia.com/eu-to-ban-heirloom-seeds-and-criminalize-unregistered-gardens/
http://www.infowars.com/agri-terrorism-feds-shut-down-seed-library-in-pennsylvania/
http://cumberlink.com/news/local/communities/carlisle/department-of-agriculture-cracks-down-on-seed-libraries/article_8b0323f4-18f6-11e4-b4c1-0019bb2963f4.html
  
(28) How Dare You Feed Wildlife!?
  
http://govtslaves.info/jailed-without-bond-81-year-old-woman-left-birdseed-outside-animals-property/
  
(29) How Dare There Be Prosperity!?
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/21/un-global-prosperity-is-causing-global-warming/
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/19/co2-emissions-outsourced-rich-nations-rising-economies
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/8/power-grab-epa-wants-to-garnish-wages-of-polluters/
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/idaho-swat-team-storms-yard-sale/
  
(30) How Dare Kids Set Up a Lemonade Stand!?
  
http://theweek.com/article/index/255939/whatrsquos-the-point-of-regulating-lemonade-stands
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2014/05/bay_to_breakers_kiddies_lemona.php/
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-California/2014/05/19/Police-Shut-Down-of-11-Year-Old-s-Lemonade-Stand-at-California-Race-Widely-Unreported
http://www.infowars.com/neighbor-calls-cops-on-boys-lemonade-stand/
  
(31) How Dare You Own Property!?
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/14/Wyoming-Suing-Obama-s-EPA-for-Stealing-1-Million-Acres-of-State-Property
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/08/feds-shut-down-last-oyster-cannery-in-california-simply-because-they-want-to-no-humans-allowed-at-pt-reyes-video/
http://wtfrly.com/2014/10/10/agenda-21-land-grab-obama-designates-san-gabriel-mountains-national-monument/
http://dailysignal.com/2014/11/12/proposed-water-rule-put-property-rights-every-american-entirely-mercy-epa/
  
(32) How Dare You Collect Rainwater!?
  
http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/illegality-of-rainwater-collection/
  
(33) Need Water? Tough Luck!
  
 Unelected bureaucrats around the country are forcing laws to
ration water and in some cases, completely shutting off public
access to water - interesting most of these local unelected
bureaucrats most often associate with �environmentalism.�
  
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/01/31/dwr-cuts-allocations-to-organizations-buying-water-from-the-state/
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/18278-to-protect-a-mouse-forest-service-cuts-off-water-access-in-n-mex
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/06/20/3451488/detroit-water-shutoffs-complaint/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/18/detr-j18.html
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/17/wate-j17.html
https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/07/10-5
http://survivalbackpack.us/court-ends-private-property-rights-water-controlled-government/
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/03/24/the-agenda-21-water-police-are-making-their-move-to-enslave-american-communities/
  
(34) How Dare There Be Gold Mining!?
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/28/epa-moves-against-major-alaska-gold-mine-could-sideline-project-over-salmon/
  
(35) How Dare You Live Off The Grid!?
  
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/02/court-rules-off-the-grid-living-is-illegal/
http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/gov-swat-teams-target-rugged-individuals-who-grow-their-own-food-produce-their-own-electricity-01042014
  
(36) How Dare You Live Near Water!?
  
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/biggest-land-grab-in-the-history-of-the-world/
http://wealthydebates.com/epa-requesting-jurisdiction-public-private-streams-us/
http://www.naturalnews.com/044912_EPA_land_grab_seasonal_streams.html
http://govtslaves.info/epa-set-regulate-private-ditches-streams/
http://wearechange.org/new-epa-land-grab-complete-control-private-land-america/
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/epa-bullies-wyoming-family-and-threatens-them-with-massive-fines-over-a-duck-pond_032014
http://survivalbackpack.us/mega-banks-monopolizing-control-water/
http://survivalbackpack.us/court-ends-private-property-rights-water-controlled-government/
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/03/24/the-agenda-21-water-police-are-making-their-move-to-enslave-american-communities/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/27/blueprint-for-water-control-pol-says-epa-secretly-created-maps-for-new/
http://dailysignal.com/2014/08/30/maps-developed-secret-suggest-epa-may-expanding-regulation/
http://dailysignal.com/2014/11/12/proposed-water-rule-put-property-rights-every-american-entirely-mercy-epa/
  
(37) How Dare You Have an Alternative Opinion!?
  
http://www.infowars.com/college-professor-calls-for-climate-change-deniers-to-be-imprisoned/
http://www.infowars.com/liberal-fascist-calls-for-global-warming-skeptics-to-be-arrested/
http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/04/07/gawker-says-arrest-climate-change-deniers-but-where-would-we-put-them/
http://ecowatch.com/2015/03/16/al-gore-sxsw-punish-climate-deniers/
  
(38) How Dare You Use a Gun On You�re Property!?
  
http://www.guns.com/2014/05/02/florida-carry-saf-file-lawsuit-against-tallahassee-for-gun-restriction/
  
(39) How Dare Farmers Have Livestock!?
  
http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2014/04/holda_change_in_rules_for_mich.html
http://www.offthegridnews.com/2014/05/02/michigan-bans-animals-on-small-farms/
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/michigan-right-to-farm/
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/seaford-oyster-company/
http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/its-a-bad-day-to-be-a-striped-pig-03282012
  
(40) How Dare You Provide Organic Food!?
  
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/07/daisy-luther/the-food-stasi/
http://govtslaves.info/food-nazis-attack-michigan-stealth/
http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/michigan-dept-of-agri-forces-farmer-to-dump-248-gallons-of-organic-milk-and-break-1200-free-range-eggs-07222014
  
(41) How Dare You Invite People Into You�re Home!?
  
http://govtslaves.info/virginia-proposal-limit-many-people-can-visit-house/
  
(42) How Dare You Sit on a Public Sidewalk!?
  
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/25453493/police-say-dont-sit-on-downtown-spokane-sidewalks
  
(43) How Dare You Grow Blueberries in Police State USA!?
  
http://wearechange.org/swat-team-raids-organic-farm-confiscates-blueberries/
  
(44) How Dare We Use Natural Gas!?
  
 Natural gas - the thing that environmentalists lobbied for
since the 1960s is now considered a threat. How ironic.
  
http://www.science20.com/science_20/now_that_natural_gas_is_working_methane_is_being_called_more_damaging_than_co2-136356
  
(45) How Dare You Give Away Books, You Slaves!?
  
http://www.kmbc.com/news/leawood-shuts-down-boys-little-free-library/26552394
http://boingboing.net/2014/06/19/boy-9-creates-library-in-his.html
  
(46) How Dare You Not Have A Perfect Lawn!?
  
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/abilene-grass-length/
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/korte-brown-grass/
http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/26809043/woman
  
(47) How Dare You Take Pictures of Wilderness Areas!?
  
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/photography-permits-in-national-forests/
http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2014/10/10/u-s-government-wants-to-charge-1500-to-take-a-photo-in-federal-wilderness-areas/
  
  
TRACKING THE TRENDS OF ECO-FASCISM!
    
(48) The EPA Can�t Even Keep Their Own Environment Clean
  
 Contractors built secret man caves in an EPA warehouse, an
employee pretended to work for the CIA to get unlimited
vacations and one worker even spent most of his time on the
clock looking at pornography.
  
 It appears, however, that a regional office has reached a new
low: Management for Region 8 in Denver, Colo., wrote an email
earlier this year to all staff in the area pleading with them
to stop inappropriate bathroom behavior, including defecating
in the hallway.
  
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/shock-epa-cant-keep-environment-clean-employees-asked-stop-defecating-office-hallways/
  
 Well, this puts a new spin on the term �government waste�:
confounded with the problem of an unknown individual leaving
feces in public hallways, a regional branch of the Environmental
Protection Agency hired an outside consultant to inform their
employees that pooping in hallways is bad.
  
 Government Executive got their hands on an email from the
management EPA�s Region 8 in Denver, Colo., in which a supervisor
begged his employees to stop �placing feces in the hallway� and
clogging up toilets with paper towels. While this is, obviously,
a very disgusting matter, the story veers into pretty dumb
territory soon:
  
 Confounded by what to make of this occurrence, EPA management
�consulted� with workplace violence �national expert� John
Nicoletti, who said that hallway feces is in fact a health and
safety risk. He added the behavior was �very dangerous� and the
individuals responsible would �probably escalate� their actions.
  
 According to his bio, Nicoletti is, indeed, a nationally-recognized
expert on workplace and school violence prevention, with accolades
from the National Science Foundation and numerous chairmanships.
He�s even �a member of NASA�s team for developing analog�s for
training astronauts for long duration missions, such as the
Mars Mission.�
  
 Why such a distinguished mind was consulted by the EPA to reach
the conclusion that �placing feces in the hallway� is bad, we�ll
never know.
  
http://www.mediaite.com/online/epa-hires-consultant-to-tell-them-that-pooping-in-hallways-is-bad/
  
 NOTE: these are the kinds of people who are calling for total
micro-managment over all aspects of the American economy ...
  
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/new-epa-regs-issued-under-obama-are-38-times-long-bible
  
A new report reveals that the story is even more disturbing.
  
http://www.mediaite.com/online/mystery-epa-poop-story-is-worse-than-we-thought/
  
http://www.infowars.com/report-mystery-epa-employee-poops-spreads-menstrual-blood-around-office/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(49) Incandescent Ban to Bankrupt Bird Care Centre
  
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/incandescent-bulb-ban-leaves-bird-care-centre-with-dim-hope-1.2492890
  
 Ottawa�s Wild Bird Care Centre has put the call
out for incandescent light bulbs, which it uses to
provide warmth for injured and recovering birds,
after the federal government banned manufacturers
from making the bulbs.
  
 In Canada, the more energy-efficient compact
fluorescent light bulbs are considered the norm.
The incandescent light bulbs use more power, but
they are also warmer and serve an important role
inside incubators.
  
 �As the light bulb is on, it will obviously warm
things up and then the setting will turn it off to
keep the right temperature,� explained Mireille
Goguen, who works at the centre.
  
 She said they were caught off-guard by the bulb
ban and they are already running short on
incandescent bulbs. Now they are asking people
to donate 100-watt bulbs.
  
 �(We will take) as many as possible. If people
have them hanging around we will take them or if
they want to buy them for us it would be much
appreciated,� said Goguen.
  
 Donations can be dropped off at the centre,
which is located on Moodie Drive in the city�s
west end.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(50) Plastic Bag Ban is a TAX SCAM
  
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Opponents-Slam-Proposed-Plastic-Bag-Ban-236474401.html
  
 Opponents of a proposed plastic bag ban gathered
Wednesday to call on the San Diego City Council to
abandon the plan to remove plastic bags from local
stores.
  
 Community leaders, including Mark Arabo, president
of the Neighborhood Market Association, held a press
conference in front of Rainbow Market on Federal
Boulevard in which they called the proposed ban a
tax scam that will negatively impact working-class
San Diegans.
  
 �This is a terrible plan. It�s terrible because
the solution is worse than the so-called problem,�
said Arabo. �It�s a classic case of politicians
attempting to do something for the environment,
in part to appease some environmental groups,
without seeing the bigger picture.�
  
 The proposed ban would remove plastic bags from
stores while imposing a paper bag tax on customers.
Shoppers would be charged 10 cents for each paper
bag they might need at a store.
  
 �This ban will have reaching ramifications. It�ll
cost taxpayers � mothers, fathers and brothers �
more money when they go shopping for groceries,�
said Arabo.
  
 Though the ban is designed to reduce waste and
help the environment, Arabo argued that plastic
bags only make up one-third of one percent of
the waste stream.
  
 On the other end of the plastic bag ban debate,
Sherri Lightner, San Diego City Council President
Pro Tem, District 1, supports the proposed ban.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(51) Eco-fascists Want to Police Households
  
http://www.chicoer.com/editorials/ci_24875035/editorial-toilet-police-dont-want-job
  
 The state mandates water-saving toilets and showers
in all homes, but obviously didn�t think long about
how to achieve that.
  
 First the city of Chico had the ban on nuclear weapons,
then wood-burning stoves, then plastic bags. Now
comes a ban on high-flow toilets. And if you think
the city can�t enforce that, then you haven�t met
the toilet police.
  
 OK, so the title �Toilet Police� probably doesn�t
appear on any city worker�s business card, but
that�s what they are.
  
 But let�s not blame city building inspectors for
an odd law � or even the Chico City Council. For
once, this ridiculous save-the-world concept doesn�t
come from the council, but rather from the busybodies
in the state Legislature. They passed a law that took
effect Jan. 1 that requires water-conserving plumbing
fixtures on any home built before 1994.
  
 How will that be enforced? Well, if a property has
any work done that requires a building permit from
a city or county, that entity�s inspector must verify
that the home has low-flow toilets, showers and faucets.
  
 To make it even more disturbing, the low-flow
inspection doesn�t occur if you�re getting plumbing
work. It occurs if you�re getting any work that requires
a building permit, such as getting a new heater, new
windows or converting a garage into a den. Uh, maybe.
  
 So under the letter of the law, if a homeowner buys
a new water heater or fireplace insert for a couple
hundred dollars, he or she might spend considerably
more than that converting all toilets, faucets and
showerheads to low-flow devices.
  
 City and county building inspectors don�t want to be
toilet police. We can�t imagine them wanting to spend
time checking a person�s toilet when they�re there
to check an air conditioner. They�re taking a loose
interpretation of the law for now, and won�t inspect
toilets during projects like repairs and maintenance
that don�t involve plumbing.
  
 But there�s no guarantee the state, which passed
the law, won�t require cities and counties to enforce
a strict interpretation.
  
 With all the uncertainty, it entices a homeowner to
ignore the government requirement to get a building
permit for minor home improvement projects.
  
 Governments should be concerned if fewer people take
out building permits. It means less revenue for
cash-strapped local governments.
  
 The building industry is concerned that residents
may put off rebuilding and home improvement projects
because they would include this unwanted expense.
With the building industry and contractors finally
showing signs of recovery from the recession, we
don�t want to see new obstacles.
  
 Once again the state passes a goofy law without
thinking about the consequences, since somebody else
has to enforce it. The city and county building
departments urge residents not to be scared off by
the new laws, to call and ask questions. It seems
they are like the rest of us, trying to figure out
how long they can ignore the fools in Sacramento
before they get caught.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(52) DOE Eco-fascists Roll Out Household Spy Grid
  
 DOE says its energy-scoring spyware - called the
Home Energy Scoring Tool - is like a vehicle�s
mile-per-gallon rating because it allows government
to compare the energy performance of individual homes
to other homes nationwide. It also provides homeowners
with suggestions (or mandates, in the near future)
for �improving their homes� efficiency.�
  
 The software is part of the government�s effort
to reduce the nation�s energy consumption; but it�s
also billed as a way to keep home-retrofitting going,
at a time when stimulus funds for weather-proofing
have run out - you see, the federated fascists care
more about spying on our energy consumption rather
than providing weather-proof options for our homes.
  
Read the rest of the �trendy� PR garbage here,
  
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/doe-plugs-energy-rating-homes-similar-mpg-rating-cars
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(53) �Sustainable Communities Investment Authority�
Plan to Bulldoze Households for Corporate Projects
  
http://benswann.com/californias-dangerous-idea-give-unelected-bureaucrats-the-power-to-confiscate-the-private-property-of-americans/
  
 California�s Senate Bill 1 is what the founding
fathers fought against. Straight from the UN Agenda
21�s playbook, SB1 will give power to a county to
form a �Sustainable Communities Investment Authority�
(SCIA). These Authorities have the power of eminent
domain and can confiscate private property to build
�sustainable communities.� The bill essentially paves
the way for the loss of any true private property in
California, resulting in the loss of freedom and
driving down home values. If the Senate passes the
modified bill, only Governor Jerry Brown (D � CA)
will stand in its way of becoming law.
  
 This means that city and county governments can
create unelected bureaucracies with the power to do
what�s necessary to create �sustainable communities.�
It also means that the definition of �blight� will
change from the original definition of abandoned
and decaying buildings on residential lots to a
much wider definition including anything the
bureaucracies need to create sustainable communities.
  
 Not only would the government be able to use eminent
domain to procure land for public transportation,
it could take private homes within half a mile of
that public transportation in the name of creating
a sustainable community. A private home is not
really private if it could be taken at any time
to create low income, low energy housing.
  
 According to Lawrence J. McQuillan, �each Authority
will be granted powers to build �Sustainable Communities�
means jamming people into dense, urban centers using
high-density residential housing and high-intensity
retail and commercial buildings near mass transit
corridors. To that end, SB 1 will grant each
Authority unprecedented powers.�
  
 Eminent domain has gradually grown to be one of the
most oppressive government policies. Since the
SCOTUS� decision in Kelo v. City of New London,
eminent domain continues to be the enemy of property
owners. Homeowners have lost their homes to private
development projects. People have been paid less for
their land than they originally paid for it. Businesses
have even been forced to sell their buildings to
corporations. It has become perhaps the most clearly
identifiable example of crony capitalism and corruption
in the country. The government has failed to protect
citizen�s natural rights: protecting life, liberty,
and property.
  
 In 2011, citizens voiced outrage over the ideas
presented by activists, environmentalists and
private developers. Property owners are worried
that Senate Bill 1 will pass and the threat of
increased taxes and possible property confiscation
will become a reality in California.
  
Read the full analysis of Senate Bill 1.
  
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_1_cfa_20130307_114042_sen_comm.html
  
Sponsors ; Darrell Steinberg & Mark DeSaulnier
  
http://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB1/2013
  
SB1 Declares Suburbs & Rural Areas �Blight�
  
http://www.bayarealiberty.com/libertyblog/?page_id=942
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(54) Eco-fascist Obama Forces New Trucker Regulations
  
 History is in the making today as the Obama regime
has announced, for the first time ever, new regulations
for medium- and heavy-duty trucks regarding both fuel
economy requirements and emissions standards.
  
 The new standards are the result of a mandate first
set in motion in 2007 by Congress, and later by an
Executive Order issued by President Obama in May of
last year. The regulations will apply to medium and
heavy-duty trucks built in 2014 through 2018, aimed
at reducing annual national fuel consumption by 530
million barrels.
  
 The new regulations will be aimed at one of three
specific subsets of trucks: combination tractors
(commonly referred to as semi-trucks), heavy-duty
pickup trucks and vans and vocational vehicles.
  
 Each category will have its own regulations, but
the end goal is to reduce fuel consumption by as
much as 20 percent by 2018, which is the case for
semi-trucks.
  
 The category that will affect more than just freight
companies and large business owners, heavy-duty trucks
and vans, will require about a 15 percent improvement
in required fuel economy, although standards will be
unique based on fuel type.
  
 Vocational trucks, or delivery trucks, garbage trucks
and buses, will be mandated to reduce fuel consumption
by about 10 percent by 2018.
  
http://www.leftlanenews.com/obama-reveals-mediumheavy-duty-truck-epa-regulations-for-2014-2018.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(55) Eco-fascist Regulations to Shut Down 40 Percent
of Nation�s Electricity
  
http://wealthydebates.com/obama-regulations-to-shut-down-40-percent-of-nations-electricity/
  
 Obama administration regulations could force power
plants that make 40 percent of the nation�s electricity
to shut down.
  
 At issue are EPA restrictions on emissions that would
close hundreds of coal-burning power plants which
represent around 40 percent of the nation�s electricity.
  
 If that wasn�t bad enough, some observers think the
regulations could double electricity rates for average
households. The rates would increase because utilities
would have to pass the cost onto ratepayers of replacing
coal burning power plants or modernizing them to comply
with the regulations.
  
 The EPA rules � Carbon Pollution Standards for New Power
Plants � are part of Obama�s plan to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions which the agency says contribute to global
warming.
  
Obama Admitted Plan Would Raise Electricity Rates
  
 There is some evidence that President Obama has a
deliberate strategy of increasing electricity rates and
destroying the coal industry.
  
 �Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity
rates would necessarily skyrocket,� Obama told the editorial
board of The San Francisco Chronicle in 2008. �Even
regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or
bad. Because I�m capping greenhouse gases, coal power
plants, you know, natural gas, you name it � whatever
the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would
have to, retrofit their operations. That will cost money.
They will pass that money on to consumers.�
  
 �So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant,
they can; it�s just that it will bankrupt them,� Obama
said, �because they�re going to be charged a huge sum for
all that greenhouse gas that�s being emitted.�
  
 Obama�s prediction about coal plants have been proven
true. As Off The Grid News previously reported, in October
2013, FirstEnergy Corp announced that it would shut down
two coal-fired powered plants in Pennsylvania because it
said the cost of complying with EPA regulations was too high.
  
 Reuters estimated that coal-burning power plants capable
of generating 15,000 megawatts of electricity have shut
down since Obama took office in 2009. The news service
also estimates that power plants that generate around
37,000 megawatts of power will close in the next 10
years. One megawatt can provide electricity to up to
about 1,000 homes.
  
Awfully Expensive Electricity
  
 Those plants will be closing at a time when demand for
electricity is increasing. That will force utilities to
build power plants that burn other fuels such as natural
gas. It will add additional cost to electricity rates at
a time when the rates are already going up dramatically.
  
 �It could get awfully expensive,� Daniel Simmons of the
Institute for Energy Research told World Net Daily. �Some
people might see their electricity rates double. If there�s
no backup power plants, that means electricity is going to
get awfully expensive when you have shortages around the
country.
  
Another Obama Plan To Raise Your Electric Bill
  
 �We�re talking about dramatically increasing the cost of
electricity all to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. I
think that is the real goal,� Simmons said.
  
 Another Obama administration plan to reduce greenhouse
emissions, Carbon Capture and Sequestration, or CSS technology,
could raise electricity costs even more, Simmons predicted.
He noted that a an experimental CSS power plant in the
United States will cost an estimated $4.3 billion to build
and the EPA doesn�t know if the technology would work.
  
 �The technology is awfully expensive because it hasn�t
been tried anywhere, and that�s to try to capture the
carbon dioxide as it comes out after they burn the coal.�
Simmons said of CSS.
  
 CSS involves the use of filters to divert carbon emissions
from the air � and every taxpaying American will pay. The
CSS plants under construction will require $300 million in
taxpayer subsidies.
  
 US Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia has been critical
of the Obama administration�s policy on coal.
  
 �This Administration is trying to hold the coal industry
to impossible standards,� Manchin said. �Never before has
the federal government forced an industry to do something
that is technologically impossible. Forcing coal to meet
nearly the same emissions standards as gas when experts
know that the required technology is not operational on
a commercial scale makes absolutely no sense and will have
devastating impacts to the coal industry and our economy.�
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw
  
(UPDATE) Supreme Court Rules EPA Can Enforce Endless Limits
In Power Plant Emissions
  
 In a 6-2 decision, the justices sided with a 2011
regulation issued by the US Environmental Protection
Agency that had been challenged by Ohio Attorney General
Mike DeWine and officials in states which produce large
amounts of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide.
  
 Melissa McHenry, a spokeswoman for American Electric
Power in Columbus, called the decision disappointing,
but because the justices have returned the case to the
federal appeals court �there is no immediate impact on
AEP�s operations and we don�t expect the decision to
change our plans for our coal-fueled power generation
fleet.�
  
 McHenry said that �emissions of sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen oxide from AEP�s coal-fueled power plants
already have been reduced by more than 80 percent since
1990. Our mercury emissions have declined by nearly 60
percent since 2001, and between 2005 and 2013, AEP
reduced its carbon dioxide emissions by 21 percent.
AEP will retire nearly 6,600 megawatts for coal-fueled
generation between now and 2016.�
  
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/04/29/supreme-court-epa-ruling.html
  
 So, get ready to live in a third-world country where
many power plants will continue to shut down as America�s
utility bills skyrocket ...
  
http://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2014/04/29/epa-regulations-set-to-increase-natural-gas-prices-by-150-percent/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(56) Obama Admits Climate Agenda Has NOTHING To Do With
�Global Warming� (It�s About Government Control Stupid!)
  
 Dictatorships always desire to control and ration
countries� natural resources and now it�s happening
right here, in America.
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/23/obama-admits-his-climate-agenda-wont-curb-global-warming/
  
 President Barack Obama admitted in an interview with
The New Yorker that his plan to lower US carbon dioxide
emissions by banning new coal plants would do little to
curb global warming since developing countries like
China and India will still use coal power.
  
 The Obama administration published its proposed
carbon dioxide emissions limits for new coal plants
which would effectively ban coal power. That is,
unless they use commercially unproven carbon capture
and storage (CCS) technologies. Tighter emission
controls for coal plants are part of Obama�s plan
to fight global warming.
  
 Critics of the administration argue that banning
coal plants won�t curb global warming because
developing countries continue to build coal plants,
frustrating US efforts to lower global carbon emissions.
Obama conceded that fact, but argued that limiting
emissions here will only help the US because other
countries will come to us for the technology once
we�ve developed it.
  
 �And so if we can figure out a carbon-capture mechanism
that is sufficiently advanced and works, then we are
helping ourselves, because the Chinese and the Indians
are going to build some coal plants, and even if we
don�t build another coal plant in this country, there
are going to be a lot of coal plants around the world
that are built,� Obama told the New Yorker.
  
 �And we have a huge investment in trying to figure
out how we can help them do it more cleanly,� he added.
  
 Obama hopes that by requiring new US coal plants to
use CCS technologies, the country could become a world
leader and export the technology abroad when other
nations can afford it. If the US doesn�t lead, Obama
argues, other countries will not follow.
  
 �And it�s not sufficient for us to just tell them to
stop,� Obama said. �We�re going to have to give them
some help. We�re going to have to take some of our
research and development on things like clean-coal
technology and be able to export it to them or license
it to them� There�s going to be a process where we
help them leapfrog some of the development stages
that we went through.�
  
 �This is why I�m putting a big priority on our carbon
action plan here. It�s not because I�m ignorant of the
fact that these emerging countries are going to be a
bigger problem than us,� Obama added. �It�s because
it�s very hard for me to get in that conversation if
we�re making no effort. And it�s not an answer for us
to say, �Well, since the Chinese and the Indians are
the bigger problem, we might as well not even bother.��
  
 Indeed, countries like China and India are set to
ramp up their coal use dramatically. The World Resource
Institute reports that 76 percent of the proposed
coal-fired capacity is in India and China � nearly
1,200 coal plants have been proposed globally, totaling
more than 1.4 million megawatts of power.
  
 The Chinese greenlit 100 million metric tons of new
coal production capacity last year as part of the
government�s plan to bring 860 million metric tons
of coal production online by 2015.
  
 The US coal industry, however, says CCS is not yet
proven technology as there are no commercial-scale
coal plants in the country that uses the technology.
In fact, when the Environmental Protection Agency
wrote its rule limiting coal plant emissions it only
cited CCS projects that were government funded and
not in operation.
  
 �It is disingenuous to state that the technology is
�ready,�� said Charles McConnell, former assistant
secretary of energy in Obama. �Studies have verified
that implementation of [CSS] technology is necessary
to comply with EPA�s proposed [EPA carbon-emissions
limits] regulation and meet the [greenhouse gas]
targets necessary for limiting CO2 emissions to our
atmosphere.�
  
 �However, commercial [CSS] technology currently is
not available to meet EPA�s proposed rule. The cost
of current CO2 capture technology is much too high
to be commercially viable,� said McConnell, who now
serves as the executive director of the Energy &
Environment Initiative at Rice University.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(57) Eco-fascist Governments Love to Steal Property
  
 The builder of a fantastical fortress in the Mojave
Desert has been sentenced to jail for failing to pay
for the demolition of his life�s work. Why art isn�t
sacred in the eyes of code enforcers.
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonehenge_West
  
 The bearded builder of Phonehenge West, a structure
that became a famed piece of Mojave Desert folk art,
is heading to jail after a Los Angeles County judge
found he wasn�t paying enough toward the demolition
of the fortress.
  
 Los Angeles County charged builder Alan Kimble Fahey
$82,000 last year to demolish the structure, which
included a 70-foot tower, stained-glass windows, a
working windmill, and a replica of a Viking house
in Antelope Valley, some 50 miles north of Los Angeles.
This week, LA County Superior Court Judge Daviann
Mitchell sentenced him to 539 days in jail after
raising doubts about his inability to make payments
on the bill.
  
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2012/1222/Phonehenge-West-creator-jailed-When-folk-art-and-building-codes-collide
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(58) Eco-fascists Call for Ban on E-Cigarettes
  
 Several eco-fascist senators and a congressman want
electronic cigarettes banned on the US Capitol grounds.
  
 In a letter sent yesterday to the House Office
Building Commission and the Senate Committee on
Rules, Dick Durbin, Richard Blumenthal, Sherrod Brown,
Ed Markey, Tom Harkin and Barbara Boxer, along with
retiring Rep. Henry Waxman, said that e-cigarettes
should be treated the same way as cigarettes. The
latter are currently banned at the Capitol, nearby
office buildings, and within 25 feet of the entrance
of those buildings.
  
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/05/democrats_call_for_ban_on_e-cigarettes_on_capitol_121470.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(59) Eco-fascist �Officials� Deny Farmers Water
  
 California officials announced last week they will
not send any water from the state�s vast reservoir
system to local agencies this spring, the first time
that has happened in the 54-year history of the
State Water Project. State Department of Water
Resources Director Mark Cowin said there simply is
not enough water in the system to meet the needs
of farmers, cities and the �conservation efforts.�
  
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/01/31/dwr-cuts-allocations-to-organizations-buying-water-from-the-state/
  
UPDATE! SAVE THE FAMILIES FROM THOSE ECO-FASCISTS!
  
 Men, women and children could die because arrogant
politicians are not allowing water access to family
farmers - which should be considered a crime against
basic human rights.
  
Jerry Brown has exposed himself as an Eco-fascist.
  
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/02/03/gov-jerry-brown-calls-congress-drought-bill-unwelcome-and-divisive/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(60) New Eco-fascist Regulations to Skyrocket
Electric Bills
  
http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/doe-coal-regs-hike-price-electricity-70-80
  
 During the House hearing, �Department of Energy
Oversight: Status of Clean Coal Programs,� Joe Barton
(R-Texas) asked Dr. Julio Friedmann, the deputy
assistant secretary for clean coal at the Department
of Energy, about the additional costs carbon capture
and storage technology would bring to coal plants.
  
 �My generic question is pretty straightforward. All
of these carbon capture sequestration technologies
- add cost to these coal plants could y�all give
the committee, or the subcommittee, kind of a
baseline estimate of how much it adds to the cost,
does it double the cost, does it increase it by
25%, 50%, what�s the generic estimate?� Barton asked.
  
 �The precise number will vary by plant, whether it�s
sub-critical or supercritical, by coal rank, and by
the kind of technology used,� said Friedman.
  
 Concerning the first generation of carbon capture
and storage (CCS) technology to be implemented,
Friedman added �we�re looking at something on the
order of $70-90 a ton. In that context, that looks
something like a 70-80% increase on the wholesale
price of electricity.�
  
 In short, that�s a knife to the throat for the
American middle class.
  
http://www.infowars.com/obamas-war-on-coal-is-going-to-kill-jobs-and-sent-electricty-rates-skyrocketing/
  
 When Barack Obama was running for president in 2008,
he stated that under his plan �electricity rates would
necessarily skyrocket�. Well, now it looks like he is
finally getting around to keeping his promise. New EPA
rules that are designed to cripple the coal industry
could send electricity rates soaring by up to 40 percent
in many rural areas.  And even though we have enough
coal in the ground to provide hundreds of years of
energy at current levels of consumption, Obama�s plan
is going to force large numbers of coal plants to
completely shut down because they are simply going to
become too expensive to operate. If Americans living
in rural communities didn�t care for Obama before, they
really are not going to like him much when these new
EPA regulations start kicking in.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(61) Eco-fascist Smart Meter Gestapo Raids Nevada Home ::
  
 Nevada is supposedly one of those states with a smart
meter �opt out� policy. On the ground, however, the
reality is that Nevada Energy Inc. is raiding home
owners who have legally opted out.
  
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/smart-meter-or-no-power-at-all-nevada.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(62) Eco-fascist Corporations Begin to Shut Off
Electricity to Political Activists� Homes
  
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/02/utilities-desperate-to-quash-dissent.html
  
 On the heels of Northeast Utilities admitting that
smart meters are �irrational�, we�re seeing the wheels
of reason and logic further come off the centralized
energy cart(el).
  
 In what is an illegal and thinly-veiled �psy-op�
(psychological operation) attempting to stem the
rising tide of awareness of the massive rights
violations associated with their �smart� meter
deployments, Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative
(PSREC) actually disconnected the electricity from
the home of Joshua Hart, a leader in the movement
and director of StopSmartMeters.org.
  
http://stopsmartmeters.org/2014/02/19/disconnected/
  
 As documented in our boat-rocking film Take Back Your
Power, so-called �smart� meter deployments are beleagured
on many levels, being linked to in-home surveillance,
unjustified billing increases, extortive �opt-out�
practices/fees, home and appliance hackability, health
symptoms (from pulsed microwave radiation and high-frequency
voltage transients), and a rather long list of home fires.
  
 Like hundreds of thousands, perhaps upwards of a
million now in Western countries, Hart is choosing to
not have a �smart� meter installed, preferring to not
to have his living quarters be surveiled, irradiated
or made easily hackable. And like many, he is not
contributing to his utility�s Punitive Opt-Out Fund
for the insolence of exercising constitutional and
human right. (There are many ways to retain your right
and not pay a fee or penalty for doing so � we have
written about one such method here. Under no
circumstances are you obligated to pay a fee to keep
your analog meter, though writing a well-written
notice via registered mail is often required.)
  
 Joshua Hart said on his website: �This is the first
disconnect by PSREC for failure to pay �opt out� fees.
No one in PG&E/ SCE/ SDG&E areas of California have
been disconnected solely for refusal to pay �opt out�
fees, and thousands have been ignoring toothless
disconnect warnings and deducting the fees from their
bill every month.  Why are utilities going to such
lengths to silence critics of their smart meter
policies?�
  
 So-called �smart� meters are not UL approved and have
never been safety-tested.  But according to grid
engineering firms such as Raab Associates they are
part of a technology roadmap which includes �mining
data for intel� purposes, and �data mining and
analytics� becoming core competency. What�s perhaps
even more troubling is the connection between �smart�
meters and military R&D funding.
  
 Thank goodness that huge numbers of people are
realizing that, yes, our government is so corrupt,
they would actually do deploy such technology upon
their own people.  Nipping the cognitive dissonance
squarely in the bud is the starting point for things
to change for the better.
  
 Of government/corporatist/utility desire to maintain
domination over their awakening customers, when
pondering the latest PR stunts, the word �desperation�
doth cometh to mind.
  
 And when you watch the below video of PSREC�s General
Manager Bob Marshall fighting with his conscience,
you have to wonder how much he got paid off to
disconnect, photograph and stalk Joshua Hart and
his family.  In an absurd demonstration of doublespeak
-cronyism, Marshall actually accuses the individual
whose electricity he illegally disconnected of being
the bully. See for yourself:
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33cjPZepb9c
  
Re-mirrored here �
  
http://www.uploadmini.com/index.php/files/get/BhgwS86E2I/eco-fascist-bob-marshall-psrec-general-manager.mp4
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(63) EPA Gestapo Will Not Allow Prosperous Opportunity ::
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/28/epa-moves-against-major-alaska-gold-mine-could-sideline-project-over-salmon/
  
 The EPA gestapo on Friday moved against a massive mine
project in Alaska which supporters say could contain
billions of dollars in gold and copper, delivering a
win for �environmentalists� who claimed the mine could
endanger sockeye salmon populations.
  
 The decision on Pebble Mine was highly anticipated,
and comes after an EPA report in January found
large-scale mining in the Bristol Bay watershed posed
significant risk to salmon and could adversely affect
Alaska Natives in the region, whose culture is built
around salmon.
  
 The gestapo will now examine whether to block or
otherwise restrict the mine project. But that decision
alone promises to significantly delay the project;
whether the EPA decides to bar construction entirely
remains to be seen.
  
 The action, announced Friday, is what supporters of
the proposed Pebble Mine have feared. Backers have
claimed the project could yield more than 100 million
ounces of gold, 80 billion pounds of copper and other
precious minerals. Companies have spent millions
researching and monitoring the area in an effort to
assure the EPA the mine would not cause ecological
damage.
  
 It�s well over due for some class-action lawsuits
against this gestapo who consistently interferes in
just about everything in today�s society.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(64) Court Rules Off-The-Grid Living Is Illegal
  
 Speronis disconnected all the utilities from her
modest home in Cape Coral for an experiment in
off-the-grid living some time ago. City officials
ignored her activities until she went public and
discussed them with Liza Fernandez, a reporter for
a local TV station. A code enforcement officer
designated Speronis�s home as uninhabitable and gave
her an eviction notice a day after the piece aired.
  
http://www.offthegridnews.com/2014/02/22/court-rules-off-the-grid-living-is-illegal/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(65) Grandmother Gets Eviction Notice for Colored Drape
  
http://seattle.cbslocal.com/2014/03/25/grandmother-gets-eviction-notice-labeling-american-flag-a-colored-drape/
  
 Oregon woman who was threatened with eviction if
she did not remove the American flag from her front
window has now been asked to place the �colored drape�
on a flag pole.
  
 Elodia Royce, 58, received a notice two weeks ago
that she would face eviction after an eco-fascist
neighbor complained to the landlord about the �colored
drape� placed in her window. But the �colored drape�
is an American flag she has displayed for six years
in support of her family and friends who have served
in the military, KGW-TV reports.
  
http://www.kgw.com/news/Grandmother-faces-eviction-over-a-US-flag-251797901.html
  
UPDATE: Another Grandmother Gets Eviction Notice for Flag
  
 An 86-year-old Ohio woman is currently fighting her townhome management
after being ordered to remove an American flag from her front porch.
  
 Julia Lease, who has lived in the Whitehall complex for more than 36
years, discovered the violation notice on her door earlier this week.
  
 �I thought, after all these years, how can they make me take my flag down?�
Lease told the Columbia Dispatch. �I can�t see how an American flag can
detract from anything.�
  
http://www.infowars.com/townhome-management-orders-86-year-old-woman-to-remove-american-flag/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(66) Professor Calls For �Deniers� To Be Imprisoned
  
 A professor with Rochester Institute of Technology
has called for the incarceration of any American who
actively disagrees that climate change is solely caused
by human activity.
  
 Lawrence Torcello, a philosophy professor with a Ph.D.
from the University at Buffalo, published the comments
as part of an essay submitted to the academic website
The Conversation.
  
 Torcello argues that malignant individuals, who he
does not identify, are collectively organising a
�campaign funding misinformation� about climate change.
Torcello goes on to suggest that such activity �ought
to be considered criminally negligent.�
  
http://www.infowars.com/college-professor-calls-for-climate-change-deniers-to-be-imprisoned/
  
 Torcello�s America would also see countless scientists
thrown into prison for continually presenting evidence
that shows there is no scientific evidence that human
activity is causing the planet to warm. The latest to
be locked up would be Greenpeace co-founder Patrick
Moore, who testified in front of a Senate committee
last month that �There is no scientific proof that
human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant
cause of the minor warming of the Earth�s atmosphere
over the past 100 years.�
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(67) EPA Tested Deadly Pollutants on Humans to Push
Their Eco-fascist Agenda
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/02/report-epa-tested-deadly-pollutants-on-humans-to-push-obama-admins-agenda/
  
 The Environmental Protection Agency has been conducting
dangerous experiments on humans over the past few years
in order to justify more onerous clean air regulations.
  
 The agency conducted tests on people with health issues
and the elderly, exposing them to high levels of potentially
lethal pollutants, without disclosing the risks of cancer
and death, according to a newly released government report.
  
http://www.scribd.com/doc/215909101/EPA-Human-Study-Subjects
  
 These experiments exposed people, including those with
asthma and heart problems, to dangerously high levels of
toxic pollutants, including diesel fumes, reads a EPA
inspector general report obtained by The Daily Caller
News Foundation. The EPA also exposed people with health
issues to levels of pollutants up to 50 times greater
than the agency says is safe for humans.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(68) Eco-fascist Cop Pulls Gun On Fifth Graders Building
�Environment-hurting� Tree Fort
  
http://www.infowars.com/cop-pulls-gun-on-fifth-graders-building-tree-fort/
  
 Police in Georgia forced a group of fifth graders to
the ground at gunpoint this week as they attempted to
build a tree fort in their own neighborhood.
  
 According to 911 records, Henry County Police were
called after a neighbor noticed the children �chopping
off tree limbs,� an activity she claimed was hurting the
environment and creating �tripping hazards.�
  
 Police arrived on scene to find 11-year-old Omari Grant
and his friends playing in a small patch of trees,
prompting at least one officer to reportedly draw his
firearm and force the boys to the ground.
  
 �I was thinking that I don�t want to be shot today,
so I just listened to what they said,� Grant said.
  
 As the children lay face down, the officer allegedly
screamed profanities as he forced them to spread their
arms and legs. Grant�s mother, Janice Baptiste, detailed
her son�s experience in an interview with WSB-TV.
  
 �All he could get out at the time was, �Mom, he had a
gun in my face, he had a gun in my face,�� Baptiste said.
�So my son was of course traumatized by that.�
  
 After the children were searched, Grant was taken back
to his home by the officer, who also startled Baptiste
with his unstable appearance.
  
 �He just came with such an attitude,� Baptiste said.
�His whole physical appearance was one of, �I�m Mr.
Big and bad.��
  
 Grant says he is now hesitant to play outside in his
own neighborhood, afraid of the very police he always
looked up to.
  
 �I learned that they�re supposed to help you, not make
you feel scared to even come outside,� Grant said.
  
 Edgar Dillard, whose wife made the 911 call, was
reportedly stunned to hear of the neighbor boys�
encounter with police.
  
 �Yeah, that�s pretty shocking to hear that a gun was
pulled on a child,� Dillard said.
  
 Baptiste has filed an excessive force complaint with
the department, which has now opened an internal
investigation. When questioned about the officer�s
actions, Sgt. Joey Smith remained relatively tight-lipped.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(69) ARMED ECO-FASCIST GESTAPO BEING USED TO CONFISCATE
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO LEASE FOR CORPORATE ENERGY PROJECTS!
  
http://www.independentsentinel.com/chilling-truth-siege-of-bundy-ranch-reaches-into-the-white-house/
  
 InfoWars has found a smoking gun in the case of embattled
rancher Cliven Bundy. A lucrative contract � which will
benefit Harry Reid and his son Rory Reid � specifically
mentions the need to rid the land of Cliven Bundy. In
addition, Natural News pointed out that the BLM is in
the business of selling lucrative oil and gas leases.
It does answer the question, Why now?
  
 There is a much bigger picture in all of this, however,
and that is the fact Mr. Obama believes the government
should control the land and water in the United States.
He sees the government as the protector of the nation�s
resources. It is his belief. He does not respect private
property � it is the government�s to take. That should
now be obvious to everyone.
  
 Mr. Obama is social engineering citizens off their land
into congested hubs to preserve the land for nature and
to have it available for government use, maybe even to
share the resources with U.N. member nations such as China,
because he believes in globalism, an extreme form of
globalism. He has already expressed a desire to share
the wealth from our resources with the world through
treaties such as The Law of the Sea treaty.
  
 Natural News reported that the Bureau of Land Management
is in the business of leasing government lands to energy
companies. Significant exploratory drilling is being
conducted in precisely the same area where the Bundy
family has been running cattle since the 1870s. The
�Gold Butte� area can be clearly seen in the map of
areas drilled (purple demarcations).
  
http://www.naturalnews.com/044670_BLM_lies_fracking_leases_Bundy_ranch.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Petroleum-Data-Clark-County-Nevada.pdf
  
 Oil has been found in nearby areas but oil and gas drilling
have worked alongside ranching over the years without a
problem. Of course, if the government can lease the land
on which the cattle graze, it will be lucrative for them.
  
 In July 2011, the federal government agreed to allow
China to buy up 600,000 acres of gas & oil fields in
Texas. This is the same administration that would not
allow new drilling; kicked Shell out of Alaska after
billions of dollars of investments; shut down most
offshore drilling; and tried to shut down Texas oil
fields on the remote possibility that it might harm a
tiny useless lizard that was most often known for being
road kill.
  
 The acreage takes in the Gold Butte area where Bundy
grazes his cattle.
  
 Mr. Obama prefers solar and windmills to oil and gas
however.
  
 Bundy�s name came up in a solar project that the government
currently wants to put in place with the Chinese communists
using Nevada land This time.
  
 InfoWars posted documents found on the BLM website which
BLM has since taken down. One document is titled, �Cattle
Trespass Impacts� and it states that Bundy�s cattle
negatively �impacts� solar development and would prevent
the construction of utility-scale solar power generation
facilities� on �public lands.�
  
 They are talking about a very lucrative �investment� of
$5 billion by Chines communists who will set up an enclave
� a Chinese communist enclave � on US land in Nevada.
  
http://www.infowars.com/breaking-sen-harry-reid-behind-blm-land-grab-of-bundy-ranch/
http://www.infowars.com/feds-back-down-from-bundy-siege-after-infowars-expose-of-chinese-land-grab/
  
 *** How the BLM Gestapo Conducts Land Theft ***
  
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fromaranchersmouth.html
  
 Now, for Cliven Bundy, he�s not fighting this for his
cattle or his own livelihood. He recognizes that he
will probably die before this fight is over. He has
said multiple times that he is fighting this to wake
people up about the tyranny of the Federal Government
and also to help wake up the western states about
getting the rights to their own land back from the
federal government, which has repeatedly shut down
ranchers and closed off land. (MO = 1st, get all the
ranchers, farmers, Native Americans, and foresters
that use the land for positive, sustainable production
off of the land; 2nd, grab up all the resources; 3rd,
close off the lands to public access including camping,
hiking, horseback riding, hunting, fishing, boating,
shooting, etc; 4th, sell off the resources to the
highest bidder regardless of what that will do to the
land, the local environment, or the economy; 5th,
collect royalties on the resources in perpetuity;
6th, reduce and eliminate all SLS and PILT payments
to the states, impoverishing them beyond belief.)
  
HARRY REID IS AN EXPOSED TRAITOR! VOTE HIS ASS OUT!
  
 Harry Reid has now exposed himself as the fascist
he really is - claiming Americans who try to protect
their land from being confiscated from federal agents
for corporate leases are �criminals.� Harry has now
made it very clear - he has no respect for Americans�
property rights at all. Having a vested interest with
a Chinese corporation, why would he care about us? It
looks as if Harry Reid would be willing to put civil
lives at risk for offshore corporate interests.
  
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/harry-reids-last-roundup/
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/reid-smelling-anything-but-rosy-in-ranch-fight/
http://www.infowars.com/sen-harry-reid-bundy-dispute-not-over/
http://www.infowars.com/harry-reid-calls-cliven-bundy-supporters-domestic-terrorists/
http://clashdaily.com/2014/04/inconvenient-rancher-blm-docs-show-feds-solar-plan-targets-bundy-elimination/
-------------------------------------------------
UPDATE! Scrubbed BLM Land Grab Info LEAKS
  
https://www.quickleak.org/yjmMgmPP
  
UPDATE! Reid�s BLM Land Grabber Contacts
  
https://www.quickleak.org/I6XS36R1
  
UPDATE! BLM Contingency Plan, Use of Drones
  
https://www.quickleak.org/a3J0amsp
  
UPDATE! BLM Info Action Pack
  
https://www.quickleak.org/jay47iy6
-------------------------------------------------
Identifying Mercenaries Violating US Citizens� Rights
  
https://mercid.wordpress.com/
  
Eco-fascists Pushed for BLM Bundy Ranch Standoff
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/21/environmentalists-pushed-bundy-ranch-standoff-over-endangered-tortoises/
  
BLM WHISTLEBLOWER EXPOSES CLARK COUNTY LAND GRAB!
  
It�s not only about Reid and one Chinese company.
  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWt2iNNchMA
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/blm-whistleblower-exposes-clark-county-land-grab-much-bigger-thought/
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/04/21/blm-whistleblower-exposes-clark-county-land-grab-this-is-huge/
  
The Long History of BLM�s Aggressive Cattle Seizures
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/29/The-Long-History-Of-BLM-s-Aggressive-Cattle-Seizures
  
BUSTED! Harry Reid Owns 93 Acres Next to Bundy Ranch
  
http://www.truthandaction.org/busted-harry-reid-owns-93-acres-next-bundy-ranch/
-------------------------------------------------
BLM_Land_Grabbing_Exposed.zip
(91 files | ZIP | 39.5MB)
  
http://fileb.ag/opcvkiyjekaa
http://redload.net/w5rgy94do2ng/BLM_Land_Grabbing_Exposed.zip.html
http://directxex.com/index.php?a=download&q=30521
http://files.wwqt.net/index.php/files/get/31-RlV038I/blm-land-grabbing-exposed.zip
  
BLM_Info_Action_Pack.zip
(180 files | ZIP | 182MB)
  
http://fileb.ag/wyv069kodhid
https://www.mediafire.com/?edq8578ri33dyda
https://www.mediafire.com/?5jua9jlyahs9bja
-------------------------------------------------
HERE THEY GO AGAIN! BLM Claims 90,000 Acres Does Not
Belong To Texas, Attempts To Seize Another Ranch
  
http://wearechange.org/blm-claims-90000-acres-belong-texas-attempts-seize-ranch/
http://misguidedchildren.com/domestic-affairs/2014/04/red-river-rumble-blm-wants-to-seize-90000-acres-of-texas-ranchers-land/18596
http://thelastgreatstand.com/lgs/2014/04/13/blm-wants-to-seize-90000-acres-of-texas-ranchers%E2%80%99-land-red-river-rumble/
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/04/22/blm-eyes-90000-acres-of-texas-land/
  
UPDATE ; BLM STEALING 90,000 Acres of Property From Texas
  
 US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Director Neil Kornze
responded to the April letters from Texas Attorney General
Greg Abbott (R) and Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) about the Red
River land dispute between the federal government and the
State of Texas. The letter comes approximately two months
after the initial requests from Abbott and Cruz were
submitted to the director and largely doubles down on
broad claims of federal ownership. ... ...
  
 Kornze�s letter explains the BLM�s procedures for developing
its new Resource Management Planning (RMP) process. To
summarize, the RMP/EIS process is designed to establish
general management goals, objectives, and directives for
public resources,� Kornze begins in the letter, �including
lands and minerals, managed by the BLM. The process involves
numerous steps that allow for public input, analysis, and
informed decision-making with regard to public resources.�
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/06/24/BLM-Doubles-Down-on-Texas-Land
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(70) EPA Denies Any Scientific Basis for Regulations
  
http://lastresistance.com/5403/shocking-news-epa-scientific-basis-regulations/
  
 I�m sure this will come as quite a shock to our
faithful readers, but the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) admitted that it can�t actually reproduce
the �science� it has been using for years as the
justification for its Clean Air Act.
  
 I remember very distinctly the attitude on the
Georgia Tech campus toward the environmental �science�
department. I�m sure that much of what was studied by
environmental science majors was legitimate, especially
as it concerned local phenomena and processes. But
when it comes to the global aspects of environmental
science (weather systems, causation, the long-term
effects of pollution, etc.), it becomes obvious that
environmental scientists are less reliable than
weathermen and relying heavily on extremely speculative
models of explanation.
  
 Pollution is defined by concentrations. Nothing that
is considered a pollutant is necessarily bad intrinsically
or necessarily. Even toxic elements occur naturally at
low concentrations. The EPA determines what those
concentrations are allowed to be in order to still
be considered �safe.� And recently, the EPA has been
narrowing those regulations even further, most recently
in an attempt to force businesses to �go green.� But
as it turns out, for years, the EPA has created and
enforced regulations based on data that it pawned off
as �hard science� that is impossible to reproduce
independently. It was secret science. Pet science.
Not hard science:
  
  ... The House Science Subcommittee on Investigations
and Oversight, . . . issued its first subpoena in 21
years last August after being stonewalled by the EPA
for two years ...
  
  However, despite �multiple interactions with the
third party owners of the research data in an effort
to obtain that data,� [EPA Administrator Gina] McCarthy
wrote, some of the data subpoenaed by the committee
�are not (and were not) in the possession, custody or
control of the EPA, nor are they within the authority
to obtain data that the agency identified. ... The EPA
acknowledges, however, that the data provided are not
sufficient in themselves to replicate the analyses in
the epidemiological studies, nor would they allow for
the one to one mapping of each pollutant and ecological
variable to each subject.�
  
 So, in other words, the actual particulars of how much
particulate pollutants are considered dangerous are
totally arbitrary. The EPA largely set those regulations
how they wanted to, and supported their legitimacy with
a thin fig leaf of �science.� What did you expect though?
Politicized science is always suspect.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(71) EPA Requesting Jurisdiction Over All Public And
Private Streams In The United States!
  
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/biggest-land-grab-in-the-history-of-the-world/
  
http://wealthydebates.com/epa-requesting-jurisdiction-public-private-streams-us/
  
 In a move lawmakers and farmers are calling �the biggest
land grab in the history of the world,� the Environmental
Protection Agency is requesting jurisdiction over all
public and private streams in the United States that are
�intermittent, seasonal and rain-dependent.�
  
 The EPA and the US Army Corps of Engineers in late March
jointly released a proposed rule, Waters of the United
States, in an effort to clarify which streams and wetlands
are protected under the Clean Water Act.
  
 A statement issued by the EPA says �the proposed rule
will benefit businesses by increasing efficiency in
determining coverage of the Clean Water Act.� ... ...
  
 But lawmakers and farmers express concern that this
kind of regulation would allow the EPA in conjunction
with the Bureau of Land Management, the Department of
Energy and the Army to dictate on a never-before-seen
scale everything from grazing rights, food production,
animal health and the use of energy on private lands.
  
 �We�re hearing from farm groups throughout the United
States about uncertainties regarding agricultural
exemptions,� Murkowski said. �They say it�s not so
farm-friendly as the statements that have been made
by your administration.�
  
UPDATE! ; EPA Declares War Against Property Owners
  
 New water way rules proposed by the EPA could devastate
homesteaders, farmers, ranchers and other rural property
owners, US Senator John Thune (R-South Dakota) says.
  
 The agency�s attempt to expand its jurisdiction over
wetlands and water ways could make it impossible or
prohibitively expensive for property owners to make use
of their own land, Thune says.
  
 Under the current rules the Clean Water Act only applies
to large streams and rivers. The Environmental Protection
Agency wants to rewrite the rules so the Act applies even
to seasonal streams and creeks, and also to wetlands that
are near protected rivers and streams.
  
 Critics like Thune charge that this will give the agency
the power to fine property owners who build stock ponds,
drainage ditches and even small hydroelectric systems
without a permit. They also say it will expand the EPA�s
power over private property and entangle regular everyday
citizens in lengthy bureaucratic paperwork.
  
http://govtslaves.info/epa-set-regulate-private-ditches-streams/
  
UPDATE! Sacramento Superior Court Demands All Water To Be
Controlled By Government, Attacks Private Property Rights!
  
 Democrat Senator Fran Pavley has a bill that would give the
State the responsibility of �managing� all groundwater. That
means the water projects and the groundwater will be controlled
by government � which will pick the winners and loser. Government
will decide if you can use your private property�water�to grow
your crops or be forced at the barrel of a gun give your water
to your neighbor that paid nothing for the well you dug and
now he will use. Want to collapse agriculture in this State
literally overnight, give control of water to government.
  
 Now a court may have decided the issue�against the free market,
against private property and is ordering a county to take over
control of water in its domain. This is like watching a car
crash in slow motion�you see it but feel helpless to stop it.
  
 �Sacramento Superior Court Judge Allen Sumner just issued a
preliminary ruling that Siskiyou County must regulate groundwater
well permits along the Scott River in accordance with �Public
Trust Doctrine.� This means the water now mainly used by hay
farmers also will have to be divided among commercial sports
fishing, kayaking, Indian Tribes and tourist-hotel interests.�
  
If upheld, this is the how California will be shut down.
  
 Sacramento Superior Court Judge Allen Sumner just issued a
preliminary ruling that Siskiyou County must regulate groundwater
well permits along the Scott River in accordance with �Public
Trust Doctrine.� This means the water now mainly used by hay
farmers also will have to be divided among commercial sports
fishing, kayaking, Indian Tribes and tourist-hotel interests.
  
 The result will be more water shortages as additional political
special interests divvy up a limited supply. ... ...
  
 The Siskiyou County court case involves a recent lawsuit brought
by the Environmental Law Foundation and the Pacific Coast
Federation of Fishermen�s Associations against the State Water
Resources Control Board and the County of Siskiyou. ELF charged
that decreased water flows in the Scott River over the past 20
years are due to excessive agricultural extractions of groundwater
that flow into the river, which has harmed fish populations and
the navigability of the river for recreational rafting and boat
fishing.
  
 The Scott River runs 60 miles in Siskiyou County, located along
the northerly state border with Oregon. The Scott River watershed
is 800 square miles. About two-thirds is privately owned and a
third publicly owned.  Forty-five percent is used for forestry,
40 percent for grazing, and only 13 percent for cropland. The
Scott River Groundwater Basin is still the only one in all of
California that has surface water and groundwater legally defined
as �interconnected� (Water Code 2500.5).
  
 The Scott River watershed was �adjudicated in 1980,� meaning the
normal court system for water rights settled local disputes. The
Siskiyou County Superior Court ruled that all groundwater within
500 feet of the river was subject to court monitoring and
restrictions on pumping.
  
http://survivalbackpack.us/court-ends-private-property-rights-water-controlled-government/
  
EPA STILL PUSHING MASSIVE LAND GRAB, WANTS PROPERTY RIGHTS NULLIFIED!
  
 It seems incredible, but a single missing word could turn a water law into
a government land grab so horrendous even a U.S. Supreme Court justice warned
it would �put the property rights of every American entirely at the mercy of
Environmental Protection Agency employees.�
  
 The missing word is �navigable.� The Obama administration is proposing a rule
titled �Definition of �Waters of the United States� Under the Clean Water Act,�
which would strike �navigable� from American water law and redefine any piece
of land that is wet at least part of the year, no matter how remote or isolated
it may be from truly navigable waters, as �waters of the United States,� or
WOTUS.
  
 The proposed rule would provide EPA and the Corps of Engineers (as well as
litigious environmental groups) with the power to dictate the land-use decisions
of homeowners, small businesses and local communities throughout the United
States. There would be virtually no limit to the federal government�s authority
over private property.
  
 The proposed rule has ignited a firestorm of protest. Agricultural and business
interests, free-market think tanks, state agencies, attorneys general and governors
have joined the �Ditch the Rule� movement and demanded it be withdrawn.
  
 The Obama administration is conducting an aggressive shield campaign to downplay
the proposed rule�s huge negative impacts and paint critics as opponents of clean
water, shills for development interests or anything other than concerned citizens.
  
 Obama�s own political shills for anti-development interests, such as Organizing
for Action, Natural Resources Defense Council and Clean Water Action, are marching
in lockstep with the agencies to discredit any opposition to the rule.
  
 But recently, a group of 25 U.S. senators called out the Obama administration for
misleading Americans on the proposed rule. In a scathing letter to the EPA and the
Corps, the senators detailed the administration�s deceptions and bias:
  
� The Obama administration claims the proposed �Waters of the United States� rule
responds to prior requests for a Clean Water Act rulemaking. It does not.
  
� The Obama administration insinuates that opposition to the proposed rule is
equivalent to opposition to clean water. It is not.
  
� EPA has attempted to delegitimize questions and concerns surrounding the proposed
rule. Concerns are legitimate.
  
� EPA and the Corps have blatantly misrepresented the impacts of increased Clean
Water Act jurisdiction. The impacts are real.
  
� EPA�s social media advocacy in favor of the proposed �Waters of the United States�
rule prejudices the rulemaking process. It kills debate.
  
 Affected parties are more credible in this battle than the administration. The
American Farm Bureau started the �Ditch the Rule� movement with pictures that showed
what the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers would regulate if the Waters of the United
States rule takes effect: �wetlands� that are nothing more than low spots on a farm
field, the decorative pond of a suburban home or even a vacant lot that the agency
designates as possessing the requisite wetness.
  
 If the farmer fills in low spots or the homeowner builds a child�s playhouse by the
pond, or a business constructs a new office on the vacant lot or anyone touches any
bureaucrat-designated �wetland� in any way, the EPA or Corps may order the owners to
cease activity, restore original conditions and abandon any use of the property.
  
 If the owners do not comply, they could be fined up to $75,000 per day�$37,500 for
violating the rule and another $37,500 for violating the agency�s order. The property
owner is blocked from going to court until sued by the agency, which could dawdle
until fines have skyrocketed into the millions.
  
That�s no exaggeration.
  
 It�s from Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito�s concurring decision in the 2012 case
of Michael and Chantell Sackett, an Idaho couple who placed fill material on their
property to build their dream home and suffered exactly the outrageous treatment
the justice described.
  
 After failing in lower courts, the Sacketts finally won a Supreme Court ruling that
they had the right to sue the EPA for exceeding the reach of the Clean Water Act. At
least three other Supreme Court rulings have rejected parts of the administration�s
interpretation of the Clean Water Act.
  
 The Supreme Court trumps the president of the United States, and in this instance
shares the concerns of the �Senate 25.� But none of the high court�s decisions answer
the exact question: What is the reach of the Clean Water Act?
  
 Therein lies the crux of the WOTUS menace: The reach of the Clean Water Act is
notoriously unclear, and EPA and the Corps have kept it that way.
  
 The Farm Bureau is particularly concerned by EPA�s refusal to answer direct questions
such as, �Name three things that get wet, like roadside drainages, irrigation ditches,
and livestock watering ponds, that would not be regulated by WOTUS.� Dead silence. And
a permit to do anything in a designated �wetland� can cost upwards of $250,000.
  
 The National Federation of Independent Businesses asserted in its official comments to
the EPA, �The CWA is unconstitutionally vague because the regulated community cannot
readily determine whether a given property is, or is not, a jurisdictional wetland.�
The uncertainty helps the Obama shield campaign.
  
 Two weeks before the Senate 25 called out the EPA, the attorneys general of 11 states
and the governors of six states sent a similar letter to the EPA and the Corps.
  
 �This rule should be withdrawn and replaced with a common-sense alternative that
respects states� primary responsibility over lands and waters within their borders
while also giving land owners clear guidance,� the letter stated.
  
 Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma�s attorney general and a leader in drafting the states� letter,
told The Daily Signal, �The proposed �WOTUS� rule unlawfully and unconstitutionally
asserts federal control over local water and land by needlessly replacing state and
local land-use management with top-down, federal control.�
  
 �Unlawful� and �unconstitutional� are not words attorneys general use lightly. When
asked to size up the overall issue, Pruitt said, �The WOTUS rule appears to be another
attempt by federal agencies to implement an agenda through regulations to affect
land-use decisions that should be left to the states and private property owners.�
  
 In September, the House passed bipartisan legislation, H.R. 5078, that prohibits
the EPA and Corps from finalizing the WOTUS rule. A companion bill is stalled in
the Senate.
  
 With the coal industry overpowered, Obama�s rogue administration looks to have
declared war on the rest of us.
  
http://dailysignal.com/2014/11/12/proposed-water-rule-put-property-rights-every-american-entirely-mercy-epa/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(72) Family Forced to Sell Property - UN Agenda 21!
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/16/colo-eminent-domain-case-settled-with-115000-sale/
  
 A contentious eminent domain case in which a local
government sought to take private backcountry land for
open space has been settled, with the landowners agreeing
to a $115,000 sale.
  
 �To me, what just came out of it is, you can�t win,
you can�t fight the government,� landowner Ceil Barrie
said Wednesday.
  
 She and her husband, Andy, owned ten acres of land
perched at 11,000 feet elevation in Breckenridge. The
property, with breathtaking views, was a private patch
of land surrounded by White River National Forest.
  
 An old, uninhabited day-use cabin, an outhouse and a
shuttered gold mine sit on it.
  
 The Barries� legal troubles began when they worked to
access their personal paradise with a utility vehicle.
They traveled on an old mining road dating back to the
1880s and said the county did not even know about the
road until they made them aware of it.
  
 The county asked to buy the land, but the Barries did
not want to part with their piece of Colorado heaven.
  
 So Summit County condemned it, filed for eminent domain
and petitioned for immediate possession.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(73) Energy Giants Caught in Green Tax Racket in UK
  
 Millions of households have missed out on a �50 saving
on their energy bill because a green tax cut has been
swiped by suppliers.
  
 All of the big six firms � British Gas, EDF Energy, Eon,
Npower, Scottish and Southern Energy and Scottish Power
� will save money this year after the Government slashed
network charges and the cost of implementing green schemes.
  
 And they will no longer have to pick up the tab for a
Warm Home Discount � which gives vulnerable customers a
�135 reduction on their electricity bill.
  
 The Government says these changes would save households
around �50 on their annual gas and electricity bill.
  
 However, four months on and millions of customers have
not received a penny in discount.
  
 An estimated five million households have missed out
on the reduction because they are on a fixed-rate deal.
  
 The energy companies claim most people have benefited
by up to �35. But this still means they have pocketed
the remainder  � at �15 from each fixed-rate customer,
that makes �75 million.
  
 Npower has told customers they would receive a bill cut
from February only if they were on a standard or variable
tariff and had been affected by a price rise last December.
  
 Its fixed-rate customers get no price cut. They are
effectively still paying the green tax because it is
priced into their bills.
  
 Customers on fixed tariffs with ScottishPower also missed
out. The firm said it would cut their bills only if customers
ended up worse off than those who are on variable deals.
  
 EDF Energy and Eon have similarly neglected customers
locked into fixes. Their customers have had potential
price hikes lowered instead of receiving reductions to
their current bills � but this affects only those on
variable deals.
  
 British Gas, Scottish and Southern Energy have reduced
bills for all their customers � both on fixes and variable
deals.
  
 The suppliers are also hiding behind a baffling array of
price hikes and cuts. READ THE REST ...
  
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/bills/article-2610842/Energy-giants-pocketed-75m-green-tax-cuts.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(74) California Water Gestapo to Spy on Homeowners
  
 The drought in California has caused 45 water agencies
in the state to enforce mandatory limits on water use.
  
 Citizens are encouraged to turn in neighbors who are
suspected of wasting H2O to water-waste patrols.
  
 These water patrols teach people to avoid wasting water
on driveways, lawns and swimming pools, but can also
cite residents for repeated violations.
  
 �We do have the stick if people don�t get it,� Kim Loeb,
a Visalia, Calif. natural resource conservation manager,
told the Associated Press.
  
 Sacramento has deputized 40 government employees, from
building inspectors to meter readers, to stop water waste.
Six employees patrol full time for violations.
  
http://www.infowars.com/california-cities-start-water-waste-patrols-encourage-residents-to-snitch/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(75) Thanks to An Endless Avalanche of EPA Regulations,
Electricity Prices Are Going to Get Much More Expensive
  
 The problems confronting the electricity system are the
result of a wide range of forces: new federal regulations
on toxic emissions, rules on greenhouse gases, state
mandates for renewable power, technical problems at
nuclear power plants and unpredictable price trends for
natural gas. Even cheap hydro power is declining in some
areas, particularly California, owing to the long-lasting
drought.
  
 �Everywhere you turn, there are proposals and regulations
to make prices go higher,� said Daniel Kish, senior vice
president at the Institute for Energy Research. �The trend
line is up, up, up. We are going into uncharted territory.�
  
 New emissions rules on mercury, acid gases and other toxics
by the Environmental Protection Agency are expected to result
in significant losses of the nation�s coal-generated power,
historically the largest and cheapest source of electricity.
Already, two dozen coal generating units across the country
are scheduled for decommissioning. When the regulations go
into effect next year, 60 gigawatts of capacity � equivalent
to the output of 60 nuclear reactors � will be taken out of
the system, according to Energy Department estimates.
  
 Moeller, the federal energy commissioner, warns that these
rapid changes are eroding the system�s ability to handle
unexpected upsets, such as the polar vortex, and could
result in brownouts or even blackouts in some regions as
early as next year.
  
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-power-prices-20140426,0,6329274.story
  
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/obamas-epa-coal-regulations-increasing-natural-gas-prices-150/
  
 The EPA is conducting legislative warfare tactics to force
an incremental shutdown of our current electric grid. In
the meantime, Americans are being forced out of their homes
when not being connected to the electric grid or for simply
choosing to live off-the-grid.
  
http://www.offthegridnews.com/2014/02/22/court-rules-off-the-grid-living-is-illegal/
  
UPDATE ; State Regulators Warn New EPA Regulations Could
Harm America�s Electrical Grid
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/12/report-state-regulators-wont-let-epa-harm-electrical-grid/
  
 �Congress never intended for the Clean Air Act to authorize
EPA�s extraordinary policy decisions to phase out entire
sources of energy in this proposed rulemaking,� the American
Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) and the American
Petroleum Institute alleged in comments to the EPA. The
organizations were commenting on proposed new rules for
power plants, oil refineries and other industrial facilities.
  
 �Mandating the use of specific energy sources will only
serve to drive up US manufacturers� costs,� Charles T.
Drevna of the AFPM said. �Our nation is on the verge of
a manufacturing renaissance, but this and other all-cost,
little-to-no-benefit rules will threaten our tremendous
opportunity, erode our competitive advantage and drive
business overseas.�
  
 The proposed rules could drive coal-fired power plants
and many oil refineries out of business, the two groups
alleged. This could lead to energy shortages and higher
energy costs, particularly for electricity.
  
http://govtslaves.info/high-prices-shortages-follow-new-epa-mandate/
  
? UPDATE! YOU WERE WARNED! Price of Electricity Hit Record
for May - Thank New EPA Regulations and the Eco-fascists
  
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/price-electricity-hit-record-may
  
 The electricity price index and the average price for a
kilowatthour (KWH) of electricity both hit records for May,
according to data released today by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
  
 The average price for a KWH hit 13.6 cents during the month,
up about 3.8 percent from 13.1 cents in May 2013.
  
 The seasonally adjusted electricity price index rose from
201.431 in May 2013 to 208.655 in May 2014�an increase of
about 3.6 percent.
  
 If the prevailing trend holds, the price of electricity will
hit an all-time record high this summer, when demand for
electricity is at its peak.
  
 Electricity will continue to rise in price thanks to new
EPA regulations that are forcing power plants to shut down,
  
http://govtslaves.info/high-prices-shortages-follow-new-epa-mandate/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(76) Eco-fascist Governor Forces Carbon Tax Through
Executive Order (The War Against Prosperity Continues)
  
 Washington Democrat Governor Jay Inslee is not waiting
for the state legislature to regulate carbon dioxide
emissions, but instead has issued an executive order
to implement a cap-and-trade program, eliminate coal
power and fund green energy projects.
  
 Eco-fascist control freaks like Jay Inslee are
determined to bankrupt both middle and lower class
Americans in the name of fraudulent politicized science.
The only way they can enforce this (of-course) will
be through corrupted power-craven fascist gestapo
agencies through a barrel of a gun.
  
http://www.governor.wa.gov/office/execorders/documents/14-04.pdf
  
http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/29/washington-governor-imposes-cap-and-trade-through-executive-order/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(77) Eco-fascists In Virginia Pushing Zoning Ordinance
To Outlaw Social Gatherings at at Household Residences
  
http://govtslaves.info/virginia-proposal-limit-many-people-can-visit-house/
  
 A plan to ban �frequent and large gatherings at neighborhood
homes� is a lawsuit waiting to happen, a Fairfax County
supervisor predicts.
  
 Officials will get an idea Wednesday when public-comment
hearings begin in Virginia�s most populous county.
  
 �I believe the county is risking a lawsuit and/or
aconstitution challenge by interfering with peoples�
right to assemble,� Supervisor Pat Herrity said in a
statement.
  
 The proposed zoning ordinance limits �group assembly�
at residences to 49 people a day. Such gatherings �shall
not occur more frequently than three times in any 40-day
period.�
  
 County officials say they have received complaints about
group meetings at homes. But Herrity said �they haven�t
even reached 1 percent of the thousands of complaints
our Department of Code Compliance investigates a year.�
  
 �This is yet another instance where we appear to be
punishing the many for the actions of the few,� said
Herrity, who reported a total of six complaints were
received last year.
  
 Church groups, scouting organizations or even sports
fans drawn to a home�s big-screen TV during playoffs
could be potential targets of the proposed county law.
Realtors worry that even open houses would invite civil
penalties.
  
 John Whitehead, an attorney and president of the civil-
libertarian Rutherford Institute, calls the Fairfax plan
�nefarious.�
  
 �Broad enactments like these have governments assuming
that private property is their property,� Whitehead said
in an interview with Watchdog.org.
  
 �If you can�t determine what goes on at your own residence,
you have surrendered your rights. The Constitution is
founded on property rights.�
  
 Nevertheless, some courts have upheld aggressive zoning
restrictions. In Phoenix, a minister was sentenced to 60
days in jail for conducting Bible study classes with 10
people at a home.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(78) Congressional Investigation Into Secret EPA Gestapo
  
 A rogue group within the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) that is run out of the White House is operating outside
the law and for years has �blocked independent investigations
by the EPA�s inspector general,� according to an Associated
Press account of an EPA investigator�s prepared congressional
testimony.
  
 In testimony at a hearing of a House oversight committee
scheduled for Wednesday, May 7, Patrick Sullivan, an
assistant EPA inspector general for investigations, is
expected to provide compelling evidence of an extraordinary
abuse of power � even for Barack Obama � by the all but
unknown EPA Office of Homeland Security.
  
The Associated Press reports:
  
 The office of about 10 employees is overseen by EPA
Administrator Gina McCarthy�s office, and the inspector
general�s office is accusing it of impeding its independent
investigations into employee misconduct, computer security
and external threats, including compelling employees
involved in cases to sign non-disclosure agreements.
  
 �Under the heavy cloak of national security, the Office
of Homeland Security has repeatedly rebuffed and refused
to cooperate with the OIG�s ongoing requests for information
or cooperation,� Sullivan wrote in prepared testimony
obtained by The Associated Press. �This block unquestionably
has hamstrung the Office of Inspector General�s ability to
carry out its statutory mandate to investigate wrongdoing
of EPA employees.�
  
 In other words, a unit within the EPA that is under the
direct control of the White House and its political associates
is using the �national security� trope to actively prevent
investigations into EPA violations of the law. Given the
high profile of their benefactor, this group fears no
repercussions. ... ...
  
 Representative Darrell Issa (R-Calif), a frequent foe
of the Obama administration, is advantageously positioned
to put the screws to the president in this scandal, as
well. As chairman of the House Oversight and Government
Reform Committee, Issa will be heading the investigation
in the White House�s secret EPA squelch squad. �It�s
disturbing that even investigations by this administration�s
own nonpartisan watchdogs are being blocked by political
appointees,� Issa said, as quoted by the AP.
  
 Given the EPA�s egregious disregard for the Constitution
and the formerly unalienable rights of life, liberty, and
property, it is little wonder that the president�s political
team has spiked any investigation that might expose to the
light of public notice the truth of the agency�s reign of
terror. The evidence is overwhelming.
  
 Two years ago, the Supreme Court handed the EPA (and the
Obama administration) an unfavorable ruling in the case of
Sackett v. US, but it�s the events leading up to that high
court hearing that boil the blood of constitutionalists
and property owners. As reported by William Jasper, senior
editor of The New American:
  
 How long would your bank account hold out if an agency of
the federal government were fining you $75,000 per day? A
couple of hours, maybe � or a few minutes? Not many
homeowners could handle that kind of crushing financial
blow. Even a Bill Gates, a Warren Buffett, or a George
Soros might blanch at such astronomical fines.
  
 But that was the potential cost facing Idaho couple Mike
and Chantelle Sackett ... who ran into the iron fist of
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) when they began
building their home in 2007 on a two-thirds acre parcel in
a residential neighborhood of Priest Lake. Like their
neighbors who had already built homes next door, the
Sacketts got their permits from the county and began
laying gravel and preparing the ground for building.
That�s when the EPA came in and, without hearings or
notice, declared that the property is �wetlands� and
ordered the Sacketts to restore it to the EPA bureaucracy�s
satisfaction.
  
 The Sacketts, having good reasons to believe their
property is not a wetlands, were determined to contest
the EPA order. However, the EPA denied their request for
a hearing. They sought judicial relief, but the US Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the EPA, ruling that
the Sacketts had no right to immediate judicial review
of the matter. The Ninth Circuit held that the couple
would first have to go through the EPA�s years-long
wetlands permit process, which would end up costing the
property owners many times the value of their land!
  
 Basically, a group of unelected and unaccountable federal
officials has shattered the dreams of the Sackett family,
robbed them of the due process of law guaranteed to every
citizen by the Constitution, and charged them $75,000 a
day for the privilege.
  
 The Sacketts understood the enormity of the issue raised
by their pouring of a little gravel on less than an acre
of land. Said Mrs. Sackett in the days leading up to the
Supreme Court decision, �The EPA can come in and turn your
life upside down. They can make you feel really small and
insignificant. And they take away from you your sense of
America.�
  
 The EPA is not content to obliterate property rights,
however. Recent actions taken against the country's last
lead smelting facility will affect the right to keep and
bear arms, as well, by substantially impacting the production
of ammunition. On December 31, 2013, the lead refining plant
closed for good.
  
 The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported just before the
shuttering of the plant:
  
 About 145 employees of the Doe Run lead smelter [in Herculaneum,
Missouri] learned they will lose their jobs at the end of
December because of the plant�s closure, the Doe Run Co.
said Wednesday. An additional 73 contractor jobs also will
be eliminated.
  
 By forcibly closing this plant, the Obama administration
took yet another unconstitutional step � one that will
severely impinge on the nation�s ammunition-manufacturing
capability.
  
 Why would the Doe Run Company, the owners of the Missouri
lead smelting facility, agree to being run out of business
by the EPA? One word: extortion.
  
 In a document published on its website, the EPA explains
that in order for Doe Run to continue its operations, the
company would have to agree to pay �$65 million to correct
violations of several environmental laws at 10 of its lead
mining, milling and smelting facilities in southeast Missouri.
The settlement also requires the company to pay a $7 million
civil penalty.�
  
 In a statement to the press, Doe Run said the fine and the
required upgrades to its facilities were �too financially
risky.�
  
 In cases such as those of the Sacketts, the Doe Run smelting
facility, and scores of others nationwide, the EPA�s heavy
handed, unconstitutional tactics should have been investigated
and the nearly unbounded power should have been reined in.
  
 They carried on without oversight, however, and perhaps
now we know why.
  
 Many who have felt the wrath of the dictators�s shadowy
EPA division are hopeful that the House�s committee hearings
will finally expose the group�s many misdeeds.
  
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/18204-are-obama-linked-operatives-covering-up-epa-abuses
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(79) �Eco-friendly� Venture Capitalist Vindo Khosla to
Testify in Court After Blocking Access to Public Property
  
 A Silicon Valley billionaire will be forced to testify
on Monday as surfers battle venture capitalist Vindo Khosl
over access to a popular northern California beach. The
case may be the most significant challenge to the state�s
public access laws.
  
 According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the Surfrider
Foundation has accused Khosla �of flouting the California
Coastal Act when he blocked the only road into Martins
Beach� from the public.
  
 A lawyer for Khosla�s company countered and said that,
�Surfrider, in this lawsuit, is asking to protect an
access right that simply doesn�t exist.� But they were
denied their motion to prevent Khosla from testifying in
the matter, and Khosla will have to do so on Monday as
the trial resumes.
  
 As the Chronicle noted, a 1972 �California Coastal Zone
Conservation Initiative� made the �entire coast public
property, including beaches below the mean high tide,�
and the lawsuit presents the biggest challenge to that
initiative.
  
 Khosla �is famous for his backing of bold, eco-friendly
projects and is a darling of Democratic politicians,� and
is company paid �$37.5 million for the property, which
includes 45 leased cabins along the coastal cliffs.�
  
 Surfrider is claiming that since the �closed gate means
the only way people can get there is from the ocean,�
Khosla is in violation of the �public access provisions
in the coastal act.�
  
 Lawyers for Martins Beach have also weighed in, saying the
previous historic $5 �beach fees prove that the public never
had a right to access that beach.�
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-California/2014/05/12/Venture-Capitalist-Forced-to-Testify-as-Surfers-Battle-Silicon-Valley-in-Beach-Access-Fight
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(80) Agenda 21, The Plan for a Global Fascist Dictatorship
  
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/05/13/agenda-21-plan-global-fascist-dictatorship/
  
 One of the most popular films of 2012 was The Hunger Games
which portrayed a post-apocalyptic nation called Panem in
which a super-rich, super-pampered, super-callous �elite�
lived in high-tech luxury while the rest of the population
daily battled to survive in abject poverty locked away behind
prison fences in intensively-populated �people zones�. Panem
comes from the Latin phrase panem et circenses or �bread and
circuses� � a term derived from Rome and meaning to give the
people diversions and distractions to hide what is being done
to them. Exactly what is happening today.
  
 The Totalitarian Tiptoes to just such a world are happening
all around us, although most people can�t see this because
they don�t connect the dots. People tend to live in their own
�little world� and focus on only a few subjects and interests.
This gives them a distorted view of what is happening because
they are so busy concentrating on the strands that they cannot
see the tapestry. The world of The Hunger Games is already
well on the way to fruition unless humanity has a fundamental
reassessment of reality.
  
 The foundations, structure and �must haves� of a Hunger Games
society are detailed in a plan being imposed through the United
Nations called Agenda 21 which encompasses two related themes
of �sustainable development� and �biodiversity�. Sustainable
development � as in don�t use more than can be replaced � sounds
sensible enough at first until you realize what this and
biodiversity really mean in the context of the conspiracy.
  
 Agenda 21 was established at the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, in 1992,
hosted by Maurice Strong, a Canadian oil and business billionaire
and long-time front man for the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.
Strong has been a leader of their exploit-the-environment-to-
scam-the-people programme which is now in full flow. Strong is
a member of the Club of Rome, the environmental Hidden Hand in
the Round Table network that includes the Bilderberg Group,
Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations.
  
 Strong said in support of Agenda 21: �Isn�t the only hope for
this planet that the industrialised civilization collapse? Isn�t
it our responsibility to bring that about?� This is a man who
became mega-rich through the oil industry. He now lives in
billionaire luxury in China where carbon-emitting industry is
booming and he is a director of the Chicago Climate Exchange
(largest shareholder, Goldman Sachs), which is �the world�s
first and North America�s only legally-binding greenhouse-gas
emission registry reduction-system for emission sources and
offset projects in North America and Brazil�. The Exchange was
established with funding from the Joyce Foundation where Barack
Obama was once a director. Strong and Al Gore make money through
the Carbon Exchange and other means from the lies they promote
about climate change and the solutions they propose. Kate
Johnston wrote on the Globalresearch.cawebsite: �The same men
that sold us the myth of man-made global warming are the same
men that sold us the �solution� of a Carbon Tax and Emissions
Trading Scheme and now they�re profiting off their lucrative
investments which are based on lies.� Strong fled to China in
2006 after being accused of corruption with respect to the UN
oil for food program.
  
 Climate change propaganda is a No-Problem-Reaction-Solution
technique to justify Agenda 21 and its stable-mate the Biodiversity
Treaty. This is an internationally-binding document involving
nearly 200 countries. The United States signed the treaty, but
it was not ratified by the Senate after people like ecologist
and ecosystem scientist Dr. Michael Coffman exposed its true
consequences and implications. He said that he realized during
the 1980s and 1990s that the plan was to use the excuse of
protecting the environment to confiscate half the land of the
United States. Similar plans exist for every other country.
America may not have ratified the treaty, but it is being
implemented by the day. Agenda 21 demands the central global
control of all land; all private property; all water sources
and distribution; all other resources which includes people
in its definition; all energy supplies and distribution and
all food production and distribution.
  
 Agenda 21 is called �the agenda for the 21st century� and that
refers to global fascism / communism. This is a summary of what
Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / Biodiversity is seeking
to impose:
  
 � An end to national sovereignty
 � State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems,
   deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture;
   rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring �equity�
 � The State to �define the role� of business and financial
   resources
 � Abolition of private property (it�s not �sustainable�)
 � �Restructuring� the family unit
 � Children raised by the State
 � People told what their job will be
 � Major restrictions on movement
 � Creation of �human settlement zones�
 � Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where
   they currently live
 � Dumbing down education (achieved)
 � Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above
  
Learn more of the history of the UN�s Agenda 21 here ...
  
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/05/13/agenda-21-plan-global-fascist-dictatorship/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(81) US Department of Agriculture Prepping For War
  
 A May 7th solicitation by the US Department of Agriculture
seeks �the commercial acquisition of ballistic vests,
compliant with NIJ 0101.06 for Level IIIA Ballistic
Resistance of body armor.�
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/05/15/Dept-of-Agriculture-Orders-Ballistic-Body-Armor
  
 A May 7th solicitation by the US Department of Agriculture
seeks �the commercial acquisition of submachine guns [in]
.40 Cal. S&W.�
  
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/05/14/Dept-Of-Agriculture-Orders-Submachine-Guns-With-30-Round-Magazines
  
UPDATE! MEET THE NEW FASCIST ANTI-ORGANIC FOOD STATSI
  
Michigan Department of Agriculture Forces Farmer to Dump 248
Gallons of Organic Milk and Break 1,200 Free Range Eggs
  
 While Americans in the nearby city of Detroit face life
in third world conditions, unable to even afford running
water,  the state of Michigan decided to direct its resources
towards cracking down on a small food co-op in Standish for
having the utter audacity to provide milk, butter, cream
and eggs to people who bought shares in the organic dairy.
  
 The Michigan Department of Agriculture must be so proud of
their deeds, after they forced Joe and Brenda Golimbieski,
the owners of  Hill High Dairy and Jenny Samuelson, the owner
of My Family Co-op, to dump out 248 gallons of milk, to break
100 dozen eggs, and to destroy an undisclosed amount of fresh
cream, butter and cheese.
  
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/07/daisy-luther/the-food-stasi/
  
http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/michigan-dept-of-agri-forces-farmer-to-dump-248-gallons-of-organic-milk-and-break-1200-free-range-eggs-07222014
  
UPDATE! Department of Agriculture Shuts Down Organic Seed Library
  
 In yet another example of the federal government�s war on
self-sufficiency, the US Department of Agriculture shut down
a seed library in Pennsylvania, claiming that a system whereby
residents could borrow heirloom seeds and then replace them at
harvest time was a violation of the 2004 Seed Act, while a
commissioner warned that such behavior could lead to �agri-
terrorism.�
  
 When the Cumberland County Library System set up the facility
at Mechanicsburg�s Joseph T. Simpson Public Library back in April,
they thought it would be a useful way for locals to borrow seeds
and replace them at the end of the growing season, encouraging
residents to learn more about growing their own food and acquiring
key self-sufficiency skills.
  
 Following in the footsteps of similar initiatives across the state,
the library system was careful to check that they were doing
everything by the book and not breaking any laws as well as meeting
with the county extension office.
  
http://www.infowars.com/agri-terrorism-feds-shut-down-seed-library-in-pennsylvania/
  
http://cumberlink.com/news/local/communities/carlisle/department-of-agriculture-cracks-down-on-seed-libraries/article_8b0323f4-18f6-11e4-b4c1-0019bb2963f4.html
  
UPDATE! WHY THE ECO-FASCISTS ARE DECLARING WAR ON FARMERS
  
 A recent review carried out by the organization GRAIN revealed that
small farms produce most of the world's food and are more productively
efficient than large farms.
  
 Facilitated by an appropriate policy framework, small farmers could easily
feed the global population. However, small farmers are currently squeezed
onto less than a quarter of the world's farmland. The world is fast losing
farms and farmers through the concentration of land into the hands of the
rich and powerful. The report concluded that if nothing is done to reverse
this trend, the world will lose its capacity to feed itself.
  
 One major reason why small farms are disappearing is the rapid growth of
monoculture plantations. In the last 50 years, 140 million hectares - well
more than all the farmland in China - have been taken over for soybean,
oil palm, rapeseed and sugar cane alone. By definition, peasant agriculture
prioritizes food production for local and national markets as well as for
farmers' own families, whereas corporations take over scarce fertile land
and prioritize commodities or export crops for profit and markets far away
that cater for the needs of the affluent.
  
 This process impoverishes local communities and brings about food insecurity.
GRAIN's Camila Montecinos concludes that the concentration of fertile agricultural
land in fewer and fewer hands is directly related to the increasing number
of people going hungry every day. While industrial farms have enormous power,
influence and resources, GRAIN's data review showed that small farms almost
everywhere outperform big farms in terms of productivity.
  
 On the heels of the review by GRAIN is a new report from the policy think
tank the Oakland Institute which states that the first years of the 21st
century will be remembered for a global land rush of nearly unprecedented
scale. An estimated 500 million acres, an area eight times the size of Britain,
was reported bought or leased across the developing world between 2000 and
2011, often at the expense of local food security and land rights.
  
 The Oakland Institute indicates how a new generation of institutional investors,
including hedge funds, private equity, pension funds and university endowments,
is eager to capitalize on global farmland as a new and highly desirable asset
class. Financial returns, not food security, are what matter.
  
 And this trend is not confined to the much publicized buying up of valuable
agricultural land in low-income by foreign concerns. The Institute's Executive
Director, Anuradha Mittal, argues that although media coverage tends to focus
on land grabs in these countries, there is also a new rush for US farmland.
With rising interest from investors and surging land prices, giant pension
funds like TIAA-CREF are committing billions to buy agricultural land.
  
 She states that one industry leader estimates that ten billion dollars in
institutional capital is looking for access to US farmland, but that figure
could easily rise as investors seek to ride out uncertain financial times by
placing their money in the perceived safety of agriculture. The US will
experiences an unprecedented crisis of retiring farmers over the next 20
years, leading to ample opportunities for these actors to expand their
holdings as an estimated 400 million acres changes generational hands.
  
 Mittal argues that for all their size and ambition, virtually nothing is known
about these new investors and their business practices. Who do they buy land
from? What do they grow? How do they manage their properties? She concludes
that in an industry not known for its transparency, none of these questions
have a satisfactory answer.
  
 The corporate consolidation of agriculture is being felt just as strongly in
Iowa and California as it is in the Philippines and Mozambique. Mittal notes
that some of the most powerful players involved in these major land acquisitions
include: UBS Agrivest, a subsidiary of the biggest bank in Switzerland; the
Hancock Agricultural Investment Group (HAIG), a subsidiary of the biggest
insurance company in Canada; and the Teacher Annuity Insurance Association
College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF), one of the largest pension funds
in the world.
  
 Mittal argues that this is crucial to look at the motives and practices of
these major players because although institutional investors only currently
own an apparently tiny one percent of all US farmland and farmers are still
the biggest buyers of farmland across the country, the writing is on the wall
in terms of the long-term trends that threaten US agriculture.
  
 Investors believe that there is roughly 1.8 trillion dollars' worth of farmland
across the US. According to the Oakland Institute, of this between 300 and 500
billion dollars is considered to be of �institutional quality,� a combination
of factors relating to size, water access, soil quality, and location that
determine the investment appeal of a property. This makes domestic farmland
a huge and largely untapped asset class. Some of the biggest actors in the
financial sector have already sought to exploit this opportunity by making
equity investments in farmland. Frequently, these buyers enter the market
with so much capital that their funds are practically limitless compared with
the resources of most farmers.
  
 Anuradha Mittal notes that they have made an impressive foothold and that
this is the beginning, not the end, of a land rush. Not only is there space
in the market for institutional investors to expand, but there are also major
financial incentives for them to do so. She argues that if action is not taken,
then a perfect storm of global and national trends could converge to permanently
shift farm ownership from family businesses to institutional investors and other
consolidated corporate operations.
  
 A September 2013 report by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
stated that farming in rich and poor nations alike should shift from monoculture
towards greater varieties of crops, reduced use of fertilizers and other inputs,
greater support for small-scale farmers and more locally focused production and
consumption of food. The report stated that monoculture and industrial farming
methods are not providing sufficient affordable food where it is needed. The
system actually causes food poverty, not addresses it, something which people
like Vandana Shiva have been saying for some time.
  
 Numerous high level reports from the UN and development agencies have argued
in favor of small farmers and agro-ecology. However, the bedrock of food
production and food security - the small farmer - faces marginalization and
economic distress. The trends in favor of �asset-based�, corporate-dictated
agriculture do not bode well, especially for low-income (rural-based) countries.
That type of system does not exist to address food security or support local
economies. Based on speculation, the ring-fencing of commodities for markets
and the control of subsidies, prices and inputs, it exists to satisfy shareholders
and investors elsewhere.
  
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/08/06/374307/wall-streets-unprecedented-land-grab/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(82) Virginia Oyster Farmers Being Zoned Out of Existance
  
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/seaford-oyster-company/
  
 The York County Board of Supervisors is threatening the
livelihood of oyster farmers.  Zoning is a popular way for
counties to control where and how things are bought and
sold. Zoning ordinances can often dictate whether people
can work, live and play in the same neighborhood. The
details of zoning are excruciatingly complex leaving people
unable to respond in a timely manner. The enforcement of
zoning regulations involves heavy fines and/or incarceration.
In short, zoning has been a terrific way for counties to
control people�s lives.
  
 Such is the story of oyster farmer Anthony Bavuso and his
family. After years of working corporate and office jobs,
Bavuso and his wife took a short hiatus from the day-to-day
drudgery and returned with a new perspective: they wanted to
become contributors to the economy of raw materials by producing
something that people needed.
  
 Bavuso moved his family back to their home state of Virginia
with the dream of becoming food producers. Having access to a
waterfront property, and a background in oyster gardening, it
made sense to start an oyster farm. Like other types of farming,
oyster farmers have to manage the growth of their oysters � a
labor-intensive process requiring a high level of experience.
An added benefit, for Bavuso, was the knowledge that oysters
clean the water. As a lifelong Virginian, the health of the
Chesapeake Bay is never far from his mind. (Oysters eat algae,
which proliferates in the pollution of the bay, and turn the
algae into usable protein for humans.)  So the Bavuso family
started Seaford Oyster Company in Seaford, Virginia.
  
 York County maintains a set of zoning ordinances regulating
various aspects of farming.  There are a list of things that
are allowed, and if an activity is not on the list, the county
prohibits it. Penalties include steep fines and possible
incarceration. Small changes to the zoning ordinances can
easily disrupt industries and people�s livelihoods.
  
 In 2010, Bavuso followed regulatory procedure within his zoning
district for an oyster farm. He established a lease with the
Commonwealth of Virginia that gave him the �rights� to the
section of the bottomland in the Poquoson River adjacent to
his property. (The bottom lease gives farmers access to
shellfish only.) Additional regulations and permits involved
food safety. Wanting to show his interest in producing the
safest food possible, Bavuso complied with the entire permitting
process.
  
 Prior to starting the farm, the family looked at this list of
zones and restrictions. In the Bavuso�s zone, farming is �permitted
by right.� This means for people to farm the land, they need no
additional land use permits from the county. According to the
definition of aquaculture in the code, what Bavuso is doing is
considered part of what is �permitted by right.�
  
 By 2011, after more than a year of farming, refining his expertise
and growing his customer base, Bavuso read in a local newspaper
that the county was planning on rezoning to remove agriculture
activities from Bavuso�s �zone.� A �zone� is any area that the
county designates. Within each zone, the county stipulates what
particular activities can take place. Once designated, the county
applies regulations and restrictions. For example, one common
zoning requirement is that if an area is zoned for residential
building, there are restrictions and regulations determining
how from the property line a structure can be built.
  
 Bavuso wanted to make sure that he would be grandfathered in and
that these changes would not affect his farming operation. He
didn�t know it at the time, but the ordinance was crafted to
punish a fellow oyster farmer by the name of Greg Garrett. The
rezoning effort was a actually a political vendetta to punish
Garrett for supporting a challenger to a currently elected
member of the York County Board of Supervisors (BOS). Bavuso
has gotten caught up in that because he does not agree with
the agenda of the BOS either. And so began what would be at
least 3 years of limbo for a peaceful man and his family. After
his vocal opposition, Mr. Bavuso is now is convinced that they
are attacking him, personally.
  
Read more about the repressive tyranny against mankind here,
  
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/seaford-oyster-company/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(83) Mega Banks Monopolizing Control Of Water for Oligarchs
  
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-new-water-barons-wall-street-mega-banks-are-buying-up-the-worlds-water/5383274
  
http://survivalbackpack.us/mega-banks-monopolizing-control-water/
  
 A disturbing trend in the water sector is accelerating worldwide.
The new �water barons� � the Wall Street banks and elitist
multibillionaires � are buying up water all over the world at
unprecedented pace.
  
 Familiar mega-banks and investing powerhouses such as Goldman
Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, UBS, Deutsche Bank, Credit
Suisse, Macquarie Bank, Barclays Bank, the Blackstone Group,
Allianz, and HSBC Bank, among others, are consolidating their
control over water. Wealthy tycoons such as T. Boone Pickens,
former President George H.W. Bush and his family, Hong Kong�s
Li Ka-shing, Philippines� Manuel V. Pangilinan and other
Filipino billionaires, and others are also buying thousands
of acres of land with aquifers, lakes, water rights, water
utilities, and shares in water engineering and technology
companies all over the world.
  
 The second disturbing trend is that while the new water barons
are buying up water all over the world, governments are moving
fast to limit citizens� ability to become water self-sufficient
(as evidenced by the well-publicized Gary Harrington�s case in
Oregon, in which the state criminalized the collection of
rainwater in three ponds located on his private land, by
convicting him on nine counts and sentencing him for 30 days
in jail). Let�s put this criminalization in perspective:
  
 Billionaire T. Boone Pickens owned more water rights than any
other individuals in America, with rights over enough of the
Ogallala Aquifer to drain approximately 200,000 acre-feet
(or 65 billion gallons of water) a year. But ordinary citizen
Gary Harrington cannot collect rainwater runoff on 170 acres
of his private land.
  
 It�s a strange New World Order in which multibillionaires and
elitist banks can own aquifers and lakes, but ordinary citizens
cannot even collect rainwater and snow runoff in their own
backyards and private lands.
----------------------------------------------------------
RELATED ; EPA is Working for the Mega Banks to Seize American Land
  
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/biggest-land-grab-in-the-history-of-the-world/
http://wealthydebates.com/epa-requesting-jurisdiction-public-private-streams-us/
http://www.naturalnews.com/044912_EPA_land_grab_seasonal_streams.html
http://govtslaves.info/epa-set-regulate-private-ditches-streams/
http://wearechange.org/new-epa-land-grab-complete-control-private-land-america/
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/epa-bullies-wyoming-family-and-threatens-them-with-massive-fines-over-a-duck-pond_032014
http://survivalbackpack.us/mega-banks-monopolizing-control-water/
http://survivalbackpack.us/court-ends-private-property-rights-water-controlled-government/
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/03/24/the-agenda-21-water-police-are-making-their-move-to-enslave-american-communities/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/27/blueprint-for-water-control-pol-says-epa-secretly-created-maps-for-new/
http://dailysignal.com/2014/08/30/maps-developed-secret-suggest-epa-may-expanding-regulation/
----------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE! EPA�s Water Control, Land Grab Blueprints Leaked!
  
http://dailysignal.com/2014/08/30/maps-developed-secret-suggest-epa-may-expanding-regulation/
  
 A map developed by the EPA and released to a US House committee
investigating controversial proposed water regulations should have
citizens concerned, says U.S. Rep. Kevin Cramer. �It is certainly
alarming the EPA would develop these maps in secret and only release
them after being confronted by members of Congress,� Cramer, a
Republican, said in a news release accompanying his office�s release
of the maps. �The EPA has been hiding information which could upset
the public and jeopardize its massive power grab of unprecedented
authority over private and public water.�
  
 The maps were released by the EPA to the House Science, Space, and
Technology Committee, on which Cramer serves. One map shows perennial
bodies of water in blue and intermittent bodies of water in yellow.
A second regional map including North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana,
Wyoming, Colorado and Utah uses blue to show each state�s �wetlands
inventory.� On that map, nearly the entire state of North Dakota is
in blue. Critics of the proposed rule have suggested the EPA intends
to use it to expand regulation far beyond permanent bodies of water
to lands that hold water only some of the time. �It doesn�t take
much of a leap to conclude these highly detailed maps developed
with taxpayer funds are for the purpose of enforcing this rule,�
Cramer said. But EPA officials say the maps have nothing to do with
the Waters of the US rule.
  
 �Let us be very clear � these maps have nothing to do with EPA�s
proposed rule or any other regulatory purpose,� EPA spokeswoman Liz
Purchia told Fox News. The EPA claims they have �regulatory authority�
over �US waters,� but it�s unclear how that �authority� extends to
non-permanent bodies of water. In New Mexico, one landowner has
already experienced the federal government attempting to regulate
wetlands that aren�t always wet. In 2013 a landowner was prohibited
by federal authorities who cited the Clean Water Act from cleaning
out a dry creek bed.
  
 Ultimately federal authorities backed down after the Pacific Legal
Foundation filed a lawsuit on behalf of the property owners. But that
may not happen in North Dakota. �It is a gall darn can of worms opening,�
Pete Hannebutt, the director of public policy for the North Dakota Farm
Bureau, says. �They�ve been trying to reinterpret the rules for years,
and we�ve been jumping up and down saying it�s not right.� Hannebutt is
concerned about the EPA�s maps. �It could impact everything that we do
in generally accepted farming practices, including digging a fence post
hole, including running fence, including growing hay. It could have a
huge impact on us,� he said. He�s worried EPA�s regulations could be
so broad as to hinder a farmer�s ability to access his land.
  
Blueprint for water control? EPA made secret maps for new land grabs.
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/27/blueprint-for-water-control-pol-says-epa-secretly-created-maps-for-new/
  
 A top House Republican is charging that the Environmental Protection
Agency secretly drafted highly detailed maps of US waterways to set
the stage for a controversial plan to expand regulatory power over
streams and wetlands, a claim the EPA strongly denies.
  
 Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the House Science, Space, and
Technology Committee, released those maps on Wednesday, while firing off
a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy voicing concerns over why they
were created in the first place.
  
 �These maps show the EPA�s plan: to control a huge amount of private property
across the country. Given the astonishing picture they paint, I understand the
EPA�s desire to minimize the importance of these maps,� he wrote, in the letter
obtained by FoxNews.com.
  
 But an EPA spokeswoman said the maps, from the US Geological Survey and
Fish and Wildlife Service, do not depict which waters are subject to EPA
control.
  
 �Let us be very clear -- these maps have nothing to do with EPA�s proposed
rule or any other regulatory purpose,� Liz Purchia lies, claiming they were
initially created years ago and subsequently updated.
  
 At issue is a proposal that Smith and fellow Republicans, as well as farmers
and other groups, say could endanger private property rights by giving the
EPA a say over temporary waterways like seasonal streams, under the Clean
Water Act. That the agency had highly detailed maps drawn up has raised
suspicion about their purpose.
  
 �While the Agency marches forward with a rule that could fundamentally
re-define Americans� private property rights, the EPA kept these maps hidden,�
Smith wrote in his letter. "Serious questions remain regarding the EPA�s
underlying motivations for creating such highly detailed maps.�
  
 He added: �The EPA's job is to regulate. The maps must have been created
with this purpose in mind.�
  
 The high-resolution maps of each state depict a dense and veiny web of
intertwining waterways. They're color-coded to distinguish everything from
canals and ditches to reservoirs to marshes to various types of streams.
The maps show permanent streams, but also those that contain water for
only part of the year.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(84) Obama Regime Wants EPA to Force Unlawful Carbon Taxes
  
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/05/29/epa-obama-administrations-new-legislative-branch/
  
 Will the Environmental Protection Agency resurrect the
defunct Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill, a 1,428-page
behemoth that threatened to slam the brakes on the US
economy before it died in the Senate in 2010?
  
 That may seem unbelievable but it�s the likely end game if
courts uphold EPA�s draconian carbon �pollution� rules for
new and existing fossil-fuel power plants, which are almost
fully upon us. And American democracy will also suffer if
EPA goes ahead.
  
 EPA�s carbon rule, proposed last September, would use the
existing Clean Air Act to establish a new source performance
standard (NSPS)�a limit, in plain English�for carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions that no commercial coal-fired power plant
can possibly meet.
  
 The proposed standard is 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt
hour of electricity produced. Today�s most advanced commercial
coal power plants emit 1,800 pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour.
New plants could comply only by installing carbon capture and
storage (CCS) technology � a capability that can add 80% to
the cost of building a new coal plant.
  
 To make the proposal look reasonable, EPA has to bend reality
a lot. Under section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act, NSPS are to
reflect the �best system of emission reduction� that has been
�adequately demonstrated.� EPA claims CCS is adequately
demonstrated -- but there are no commercial-scale power
plants operating anywhere with CCS, and none is being built
without heavy taxpayer and/or consumer subsidies.
  
 In short, a utility that builds a new coal plant with CCS,
as required by EPA�s ruling, risks going bankrupt. The rule
is thus an informal ban on investment in new coal power
generation.
  
When did Congress approve that policy? Never!
  
FLASHBACK ; Obama Promises to Bankrupt US Coal Industry
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw
  
Mirror here � http://f.lui.li/get_1506_4f4d.html
  
UPDATE ; The EPA Claims They Will Force Carbon Taxation,
Commences Financial Warfare Against Power Plants and the
Consumers Within the United States of America!
  
 Total lawlessness by an agency granting themselves
dictatorial power to create and enforce their own laws!
  
NO LEGISLATION PASSED. NO EXECUTIVE ORDER. JUST SANCTIONS.
  
Get ready to live the life of a third world dictatorship.
  
 The Obama regime took aim at the coal industry on Monday
by mandating a 30 percent cut in carbon emissions at fossil
fuel-burning power plants by 2030 -- despite claims the
regulation will cost nearly a quarter-million jobs a year
and force plants across the country to close.
  
http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-05/documents/20140602proposal-cleanpowerplan.pdf
  
 The 645-page rule, expected to be final next year, is a
centerpiece of the UN�s Agenda 21, and a step that the
Obama regime hopes will get other countries to �act� when
negotiations on a new international treaty resume next year.
  
 If you would like to live a more prosperous life in the
future, you may have no other choice but to consider
leaving this country. America is damned to collapse.
  
http://www.infowars.com/obamas-epa-coal-plant-regulations-obamacare-for-the-atmosphere/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(85) EPA To EXPAND Use Of Bee Killing Pesticides
  
 The EPA wants to expand the use of two pesticides that
could be a major threat to America�s bee population, farms
and the nation�s food supply. That�s the charge being made
by the Center for Food Safety and beekeepers.
  
 The agency is proposing more uses for thiamethoxam,
apesticide that has been banned in the European Union
because it is considered a threat to bees. A letter from
the Center to the Environmental Protection Agency raises
some serious concerns about thiamethoxam and another
pesticide, sulfoxaflor.
  
 �Peer-reviewed scientific studies have consistently shown
that these systemic chemicals are highly toxic to honeybees,
other pollinators and beneficial insects,� the letter
states. �Pollinator losses represent a serious threat to
the agricultural industry and food security. Furthermore,
these systemic pesticides have also been shown to negatively
impact beneficial insects and contaminate water bodies and
soil.�
  
The Threat from Neonic Pesticides
  
 Thiamethoxam and sulfoxaflor are neonic or neonicotinoid
pesticides which studies have tied to bee deaths, as Off
The Grid News has reported. Last year scientists from Health
Canada (Canada�s Department of Health) found 70 percent of
bees that died from colony collapse tested positive for
neonicotinoids. AHarvard study this year also tied bee
deaths to neonicotinoids.
  
 �They�re taking in something that they will ultimately die
from, and they�re taking this into the hive and feeding on
it all winter, then we wonder why we have winter mortality,�
Madeline Chagnon, an environmental scientist at the University
of Quebec, said of bees and the pesticides.
  
 Chagnon says the pesticides enter the soil when they are
coated on seeds. The soil then becomes dusty and is stirred
up during agricultural processes. The dust exposes the bees
to the pesticides and eventually kills them. Bees can also
become exposed to the chemicals while pollinating crops.
  
http://livegreatfeelgreat.com/2014/06/epa-expand-use-bee-killing-pesticides/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(86) EPA Bullies Wyoming Family and Threatens Them With
Massive Fines � Over a Duck Pond
  
http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/epa-bullies-wyoming-family-and-threatens-them-with-massive-fines-over-a-duck-pond-03252014
  
 A Wyoming family is being threatened with massive fines for
building a stock pond on their eight-acre farm.
  
 Andy and Katie Johnson built the pond in 2012. They stocked it
with trout, ducks, and geese.
  
 Of course, the government is why we can�t have nice things.
Naturally, the EPA has found a reason to come around and harass
the Johnsons and prevent them from enjoying their property.
  
 Johnson said the EPA has engaged him in a power play and is
threatening him with massive civil and criminal penalties over
the pond, which they claim is actually a �dam.�
  
Fox News reports:
  
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/14/wyoming-welder-faces-fine-for-building-pond-on-his-own-property
  
 The agency claims Johnson violated the Clean Water Act by
building a dam on a creek without a permit from the Army Corps
of Engineers. Further, the EPA claims that material from his
pond is being discharged into other waterways. Johnson says he
built a stock pond � a man-made pond meant to attract wildlife
� which is exempt from Clean Water Act regulations.
  
 Johnson said that his pond is exempt from the law, and he
followed state regulations in building it. He has an approval 
etter from the Wyoming State Engineer�s Office as proof, which
states:
  
 �Said permit is in good standing and is entitled to be exercised
exactly as permitted,� says the letter.
  
 The agency is threatening to hit the family with up to $75,000 a
DAY in fines. Johnson said he�s not paying them a cent:
  
 �I have not paid them a dime nor will I. I will go bankrupt if I
have to fighting it. My wife and I built [the pond] together. We
put our blood, sweat and tears into it. It was our dream.�
  
 Of course, the EPA isn�t backing down. They argue that Johnson
needs to either restore the land or pay the fines. On January 30,
the agency gave Johnson 30 days to hire a consultant to assess the
impact of the supposed unauthorized work and to create a restoration
proposal. That proposal has to be approved by the EPA, of course,
and it must contain a schedule. All work would have to be completed
within 60 days of the plan�s approval.
  
 Sounds like they are setting him for failure, doesn�t it? Even if
he DID violate the law and agreed to make things right, would meeting
those terms even be possible?
  
 If Johnson does not comply with those terms, the EPA is going to
fine him $37,500 per day in civil penalties, along with $37,500 more
every day for statutory violations.
  
 Johnson is fighting back and has gained the support of three Republican
senators � John Barrasso and Mike Enzi, who both represent Wyoming �
and Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, Fox News reports:
  
 The Republican lawmakers sent a March 12 letter to Nancy Stoner, the
EPA�s acting assistant administration for water, saying they were
�troubled� by Johnson�s case and demanding the EPA withdraw the
compliance order.
  
 �Rather than a sober administration of the Clean Water Act, the
Compliance Order reads like a draconian edict of a heavy-handed
bureaucracy,� the letter states.
  
 The letter also questions the EPA�s claim that Johnson�s pond is
actually a dam:
  
 �Fairness and due process require the EPA base its compliance order
on more than an assumption,� they wrote. �Instead of treating Mr.
Johnson as guilty until he proves his innocence by demonstrating his
entitlement to the Clean Water Act section 404 (f)(1)(C) stock pond
exemption, EPA should make its case that a dam was built and that the
Section 404 exemption does not apply.
  
 �If the compliance order stands as an example of how EPA intends
to operate after completing its current �waters of the United States�
rule-making, it should give pause to each and every landowner throughout
the country.�
  
 Johnson said his battle with the EPA is serving as a learning
experience for his children:
  
 �This is showing them that they shouldn�t back down. If you need to
stand up and fight, you do it.
  
 �This goes a lot further than a pond. It�s about a person�s rights. I
have three little kids. I am not going to roll over and let [the government]
tell me what I can do on my land. I followed the rules.�
  
 The infringement on Johnson�s property rights under the veil of
protecting the environment is bad enough, but some say that the
astronomical fines are perhaps an even bigger issue � and may even
be unconstitutional, as Evan Bernick of The Foundry explains:
  
 But the eye-popping aspect of this story is the severity of the
penalties threatened. It�s absurd to threaten someone with tens of
thousands of dollars in fines because he or she lacks a permit. And
it might also be unconstitutional.
  
 The Framers of our Constitution recognized that, at a certain point,
penalties become unconstitutionally disproportionate. The Eighth
Amendment�s Excessive Fines Clause reflects that understanding. In
Austin v. U.S. (1993), and again in U.S. v. Bajakajian (1998), the
U.S. Supreme Court explained that �[t]he Excessive Fines Clause
limits the government�s power to extract payments, whether in cash
or in kind, as punishment for some offense,� and held that civil
sanctions that do not serve solely remedial purposes are subject
to the Excessive Fines Clause. It is impossible to understand the
threatened fines as serving a purely remedial purpose�surely,
repairing any damage that Johnson inflicted would cost less than
$75,000 a day. But, under the terms of the CWA, he is potentially
subject to such penalties as a consequence of his failure to obtain
a permit.
  
 This is just another sad case of big government stomping all over
the little guy. Hopefully the EPA won�t get away with destroying the
Johnsons� hard work and are stopped from sending the family into
financial ruin.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(87) 2,827 New EPA Regulations Ready to Gut Economic Growth
  
 Since President Barack Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued 2,827 new final
regulations, equaling 24,915 pages in the Federal Register,
totaling approximately 24,915,000 words.
  
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/new-epa-regs-issued-under-obama-are-38-times-long-bible
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(88) Vets Died as VA Obsessed Over Renewable �Green� Energy
  
The sick and halt wait but the solar panels don�t.
  
 The administrators at the Veterans Administration have
apparently been busy while old soldiers waited to see a
doctor, after all. Serving those who served is not necessarily
a priority, but saving the planet is Job 1. Solar panels and
windmills can be more important than the touch of a healing
hand.
  
 The department early on set up an Office of Green Management
Programs designed to �help VA facilities nationwide recognize
opportunities to green VA, and to reward innovative �green�
practices and efforts by individual facilities and staff within
the VA.� This sometimes means paying more attention to greening
the department and saving the polar ice caps than to health care.
  
 In the department�s words, it adopted a far more important
mission to �become more energy efficient and sustainable, focusing
primarily on renewable energy, energy and water efficiency,
[carbon-dioxide] emissions reduction, and sustainable buildings.�
  
 The green office isn�t merely a desk and telephone tucked away
in the dark corner of a nondescript government building. It�s a
substantial undertaking, with all the luxury, bells and whistles
of a bureaucracy that means business. Eric K. Shinseki, who
resigned as secretary in the wake of the VA scandal of the sin
of omission, traveled the country to boast of the green initiative.
In one instance, he traveled to Massachusetts to flick the switch
at a half-million-dollar windmill project at the Massachusetts
National Cemetery. �Nationally,� he said, �VA continues to expand
its investment in renewable sources of energy to promote our
nation�s energy independence, save taxpayer dollars, and improve
care for our veterans and their families.
  
 VA facilities have become littered with every scheme to banish
carbon dioxide short of requiring visitors to hold their breath.
Calverton National Cemetery spent $742,034 on solar panels. Fort
Rosecrans National Cemetery spent $787,308. Not to be out-greened,
the Riverside National Cemetery spent $1.3 million on its solar
system.
  
 At the Phoenix VA Health Care System, where 20 Americans died from
incompetence and cover-up, the department spent $20 million putting
solar panels on the hospital roofs. That would have been more than
enough money to provide the veterans with the health care they deserved.
  
 Some administrators won�t be satisfied until every federal building
bears a green stamp. In military parlance, the VA is practicing
�mission creep,� the expansion of a project well beyond its intended
goals. While the rest of the government continues to waste taxpayer
funds trying to become carbon-dioxide neutral, the VA should be
spending every available dollar to relieve pain, cure the sick and
restore the deserving to health. That�s more important than any fad,
environmental or otherwise.
  
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/19/editorial-strange-priorities-at-the-va/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(89) THE EPA GETS READY TO LOOT CIVILIANS� WAGES!
  
 Far time people pull money out of the banks and start investing
in hard tangible assets and firearms to protect property!
  
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/8/power-grab-epa-wants-to-garnish-wages-of-polluters/
  
 The Environmental Protection Agency has quietly floated a rule
claiming authority to bypass the courts and unilaterally garnish
paychecks of those accused of violating its rules, a power currently
used by agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service.
  
 The EPA has been flexing its regulatory muscle under dictator Obama,
collecting more fines each year and hitting individuals with costly
penalties for violating environmental rules, including recently
slapping a $75,000 fine on Wyoming homeowner Andy Johnson for
building a pond on his rural property.
  
 �The EPA has a history of overreaching its authority. It seems
like once again the EPA is trying to take power it doesn�t have
away from American citizens,� Sen. John Barrasso, Wyoming Republican,
said when he learned of the EPA�s wage garnishment scheme.
  
 Others questioned why the EPA decided to strengthen its collection
muscle at this time.
  
 Critics said the threat of garnishing wages would be a powerful
incentive for people to agree to expensive settlements rather than
fight EPA charges.
  
 EPA officials did not respond to repeated questions by The Washington
Times about why they thought it was necessary to garnish people�s wages.
  
 The EPA announced the plan last week in a notice in the Federal
Register, saying federal law allows it �to garnish non-Federal
wages to collect delinquent non-tax debts owed the United States
without first obtaining a court order.�
  
 The agency cited authority under the Debt Collection Improvement
Act of 1996 that centralized federal collection operations under
the Treasury Department, which oversees garnishments of wages or
tax refund checks.
  
 Under the law, every federal agency has the authority to conduct
administrative wage garnishment, provided the agency adopts
approved rules for conducting hearings where debtors can challenge
the amount of debt or terms of repayment schedule, a Treasury
official said.
  
 Still, the rule would give the EPA sweeping authority to dictate
how and whether Americans could dispute fines and penalties, even
as the amount of EPA fines collected from individuals, businesses
and local governments steadily increase.
  
 The amount of fines raked in by the agency has jumped from $96
million in 2009 to $252 million in 2012, a more than 160 percent
increase, according to EPA annual reports.
  
 Putting the collection powers on a fast track, the agency announced
it in the Federal Register as a �direct final rule� that would take
effect automatically Sept. 2, unless the EPA receives adverse public
comments by Aug. 1.
  
 The EPA said it deemed the action as not a �significant regulatory
action� and therefore not subject to review.
  
The negative reactions began almost immediately.
  
 In a comment letter submitted to the EPA, the conservative Heritage
Foundation faulted the rule for giving the government �unbridled
discretion� in controlling the process for challenging fines and
wage garnishment, such as dictating the site of a hearing without
consideration of the time and travel expense placed on the accused
debtor.
  
 The rule allows the EPA to decide whether a debtor gets a chance
to present a defense and then picks whomever it chooses to serve as
a hearing officer, even someone not trained as an administrative
law judge, wrote David S. Addington, group vice president for
research at The Heritage Foundation.
  
 It also puts the burden of proof on the debtor, not the EPA,
he said.
  
 The EPA has been on the front lines of the battle over Mr. Obama�s
climate change agenda, including issuing proposed rules that would
require coal-fired power plants to cut carbon dioxide emissions by
30 percent over 15 years.
  
 Critics say it will cause massive increases in the cost of electricity,
lead to power shortages and eliminate jobs, while making scant impact
on the amount of greenhouse gasses emitted worldwide.
  
 The agency has been a magnet for criticism over new rules on things
such as wood-burning stoves and small streams or ponds on private
land, including waterways on farms and golf courses.
  
 Due Process? Trial by Jury? Innocent until proven guilty?
Those outmoded ideas from the Magna Carta and Constitution get
in the way of efficiency. UK Members of Parliament are �horrified�
at the loss while the usurpation of power in America quietly moves
from the IRS to the EPA and every other bureaucracy.
  
http://www.infowars.com/epa-tramples-800-years-of-recognized-rights/
  
Fascists @ EPA Want to Land Grab And Garnish Wages
  
 �The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to amend EPA's claims collection standards to implement the
administrative wage garnishment provisions of the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1982, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement
Act of 1996 (DCIA). The direct final rule will allow the EPA to
garnish non-Federal wages to collect delinquent non-tax debts owed
the United States without first obtaining a court order.�
  
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/07/02/2014-15578/administrative-wage-garnishment
  
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-07-02/pdf/2014-15578.pdf
  
BACKUP! EPA Land Grab And Wage Garnishment Coming.doc
  
http://f.lui.li/get_2333_57bc.html
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(90) Fascists Exempt Themselves From Regulations! What a Surprise!
  
Pelosi�s Home City Exempted From Eco-fascist Regulations
  
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/20/lawsuit-asks-san-francisco-to-share-pain-on-green-/
  
 The Endangered Species Act has wreaked havoc for decades on rural
communities, but a newly filed lawsuit could force San Francisco
urbanites like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to share their pain.
  
 A federal complaint filed this week contends that the Hetch Hetchy
Project, which supplies water to San Francisco and the Bay Area, has
unfairly enjoyed an exemption from the �severe cutbacks� required in
rural California in order to save endangered fish species.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(91) Eco-fascist Federal Gestapo Thugs Shut Down Last Oyster Cannery
in California ... Simply �Because They Want To�
  
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/08/feds-shut-down-last-oyster-cannery-in-california-simply-because-they-want-to-no-humans-allowed-at-pt-reyes-video/
  
 We at ACC care very much about the environment. I personally love to
hike, surf, and enjoy the great outdoors in all sorts of ways. I love
wildlife. A broad empty vista is a beautiful thing to me. I revel in a
starry sky devoid of human light.
  
 But I am not about to flush the property rights of my fellow human beings
just because I enjoy these things. I am certainly not willing to give power
to disconnected bureaucrats who have little regard for the welfare and
livelihoods of people who make their living from the land (or ocean) just
because I happen to want to take a stroll without being impacted by others.
  
 I believe that capitalism is in many ways more �sustainable� (especially
when accounting for �externalities� and when incorporating sound money)
than heavy handed, top down socialism. I�ve written about this in the past.
There is no greater enemy of the environment than the state. There is no
greater enemy of personal liberty than the state either.
  
 With so called �public lands� a balance must be struck between the people
who mix their efforts with the land to produce wealth, and �sustainability�
concerns. Just because someone in Washington DC decides that a pretty piece
of land should be devoid of human impact doesn�t mean that the state suddenly
has the moral authority to kick people out. They did that to the people who
lived on the Blue Ridge Mountains just to my west during the Depression. The
feds sometimes burned houses down as families watched their meager possessions
(including dogs which were ordered to be locked inside of houses) go up in flames.
  
 Now instead of just burning homesteads down the Feds send in the BLM or
crush people with unending legal bills.
  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HmOvUvEkJ4
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(91) Eco-fascist Control Freaks Target Old Electrical Appliances
  
 The European Union is considering pulling the plug on high-wattage hair
dryers, lawn mowers and electric kettles in a follow up to its controversial
ban on powerful vacuum cleaners.
  
 The power of hairdryers could be reduced by as much as 30 per cent in order
to be more eco-friendly, a draft study commissioned by Brussels suggests,
threatening many of the models favoured by hairdressers and consumers for
speedy blow-dries. ... ...
  
 Paul Nuttall MEP, UKip's deputy leader, said: �This is being done in the name
of tackling climate change but the reality is it won't help one iota and will
just make life harder for house-proud householders. I am perfectly sure grown-ups
can decide which hair dryer, kettle or vacuum cleaner they want to buy without
nannying EU interference.� ... ...
  
The fact is this is part of the UN�s Agenda 21 at work.
  
 Current EU legislation covers televisions, washing machines, refrigerators
and vacuum cleaners but not most smaller electrical appliances.
  
 EU bans on powerful vacuum cleaners and incandescent light bulbs have provoked
a popular backlash across Europe including in traditionally pro-European countries
such as Germany.
  
 On Monday many of the best vacuum cleaners available for sale in the UK will be
banned as a result of the EU energy efficiency rules that prohibit the manufacture
or importing any vacuums with motors above 1,600 watts.
  
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11061538/EU-to-ban-high-energy-hair-dryers-smartphones-and-kettles.html
  
Read about the EU eco-fascist banning vacuum cleaners!
  
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/21/anger-as-eu-bans-most-powerful-vacuum-cleaners
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/eu-bans-good-vacuum-cleaners-next-big-kettles-hot-irons/
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/themargin/2014/08/21/eu-kicks-up-dust-with-a-ban-on-vacuum-cleaners-that-sucks/
  
 Five of top selling vacuum cleaners on Amazon.co.uk that will be banned when
the new Agenda 21 regulations come in:
  
1. Numatic HVR200A Henry A1 Bagged Cylinder Vacuum Cleaner.
  
BANNED BY 2017
  
2. Vax W90-RU-P Rapide Ultra 2 Pre-Treatment Upright Carpet and Upholstery
Washer.
  
BANNED BY 2017
  
3. Vax U90-MA-R Air Reach Multicyclonic Upright Bagless Vacuum Cleaner.
  
BANNED BY 2017
  
4. Sebo X4EXTRA Automatic Upright Vacuum Cleaner.
  
BANNED BY 2017
  
5. Hoover Smart Pets SM1901 Bagless Upright Vacuum Cleaner.
  
BANNED BY SEPTEMBER
  
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/news/article-2730642/Buy-powerful-vacuum-cleaner-BANNED-New-EU-rules-ban-best-models-September-warns-Which.html
  
It�s not a bad idea to stock up on other utilities as well.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(92) Additional Three Dollar Gas Tax To Take Effect in 2015
  
 An environmental bill long championed by the Obama administration and
environmental groups was quietly signed into law this week. The bill,
initially expected to fail, was bolstered by last-minute support from a
group of RINOs seeking reelection in predominantly Democratic leaning
states. The bill strengthens environmental pollution penalties, emission
standards and creates a surprising new three dollar a gallon tax increase
on gasoline.
  
http://nationalreport.net/additional-three-dollar-gas-tax-take-effect-jan-1st-2015/
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(93) Fascist Obama Usurps San Gabriel Mountains National Monument
  
This is a massive land grab for Agenda 21. The resource taken? Water.
  
http://wtfrly.com/2014/10/10/agenda-21-land-grab-obama-designates-san-gabriel-mountains-national-monument/
  
 Prez Barack Obama declared a national monument on almost 350,000 acres
of land in the San Gabriel Mountains near Los Angeles. In a climate-change
world, those resources would be important to control under federal law
and other Agenda 21 initiatives.
  
 The mountains represent about 70 percent of the open space in Los Angeles
County and provide about a third of the area�s drinking water. Some 17
million people live within an hour�s drive of the 10,000-foot mountains,
which naturalist John Muir once described as �pure and untameable as the sea.�
  
 Rossman said the monument designation will help combat a growing litter
problem by increasing staffing and enforcement and will open the door to
more federal funding. The activist hopes the monument will give momentum
to broader efforts to protect open space in the �growing asphalt quilt of
Los Angeles.�
  
 Republican Assemblyman Tim Donnelly of Twin Peaks announced plans to protest
the monument on Friday, calling it a �federal land grab.�
  
 But Andre Quintero, the Democratic mayor of the 115,000-resident city of
El Monte in the San Gabriel Valley, welcomed the news, saying the monument
designation �would help augment the resources in that area.�
  
 Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said the designation �will ensure its
resources are managed properly and protected for future generations to
enjoy.�
  
 In a statement, he called the San Gabriel Mountains �a vital natural and
cultural resource.�
  
100% of the state is in drought.
  
The banana-republic puppet-in-command POTUS stated:
  
 �The San Gabriel Mountains National Monument will be managed by the US
Forest Service and will be the eighth national monument under Forest
Service management. There are more than 100 national monuments across the
country managed by the Forest Service, National Park Service, US Fish and
Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.�
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(94) Eco-fascists Want to Monitor How Long Hotel Guests Spend
in the Shower (for Future Taxation and Spying)
  
http://freebeacon.com/issues/epa-wants-to-monitor-how-long-hotel-guests-spend-in-the-shower/
  
 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants hotels to monitor
how much time its guests spend in the shower.
  
 The agency is spending $15,000 to create a wireless system that
will track how much water a hotel guest uses to get them to �modify
their behavior.�
  
 �Hotels consume a significant amount of water in the US and around
the world,� an EPA grant to the University of Tulsa reads. �Most
hotels do not monitor individual guest water usage and as a result,
millions of gallons of potable water are wasted every year by
hotel guests.�
  
 �The proposed work aims to develop a novel low cost wireless device
for monitoring water use from hotel guest room showers,� it said.
�This device will be designed to fit most new and existing hotel
shower fixtures and will wirelessly transmit hotel guest water
usage data to a central hotel accounting system.�
  
 �This technology will provide hotel guests with the ability to
monitor their daily water online or using a smartphone app and
will assist hotel guest in modifying their behavior to help conserve
water,� the grant said.
  
 The project was filed under �Water conservation,� �Urban water
planning,� and �Sustainable water management.�
  
 The EPA also has a WaterSense program that challenges hotels to
track their water use and upgrade their restrooms with low-flow
toilets and showerheads.
  
http://www.epa.gov/watersense/docs/ws_h2otelchallenge_flier_508.pdf
  
MIRROR � http://upstore.net/rAWQzZ
  
 �The method requires three steps: 1) turn on water to rinse body
and hair; 2) turn off water while shampooing hair and washing body
with soap and washcloth; 3) resume water flow and rinse off all
shampoo and soap,� the group said. �Using this technique, the
total duration of water flow can easily be reduced to 5 minutes
or less.�
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
(95) Eco-fascist Billionare Al Gore Wants to Criminalize Dissent
  
 Al Gore, well known for his support for carbon taxation and Agenda 21
micro-management policies wants to jail people who do not agree with him.
  
 This just goes to show that many of the people who support Agenda 21
will result to tyranny to further their illusions of creating some kind
of utopia - much like Stalin, Mao and Hitler jailed their dissentants.
  
http://ecowatch.com/2015/03/16/al-gore-sxsw-punish-climate-deniers/
  
 NOTE: This is not the first time eco-fascists have called for a
rollout of gulags against those who have not commit any crime:
  
http://www.infowars.com/college-professor-calls-for-climate-change-deniers-to-be-imprisoned/
http://www.infowars.com/liberal-fascist-calls-for-global-warming-skeptics-to-be-arrested/
http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/04/07/gawker-says-arrest-climate-change-deniers-but-where-would-we-put-them/
  
These people show no respect for our 1st Amendment right to free speech.
  
I�m sure these are the same kinds who want to disarm the public too.
_________________________________________________
�������������������������������������������������
Submit a correction or amendment below. (click here to make a fresh posting)
After submitting an amendment, you'll be able to view the differences between the old and new posts easily.
Syntax Highlighting:
To highlight particular lines, prefix each line with @@
Pressing TAB inserts 3 spaces
Paste Name
How long should your post be retained?
a day a month forever
Password (Optional)
pastebin - collaborative debugging

Recent Posts

Posted by eco on March Tue 17th 5:27 PM - Never Expires
download | new post

pastebin - collaborative debugging

Recent Posts

Posted by eco on March Tue 17th 5:27 PM - Never Expiresdownload | new post

Posted by eco on March Tue 17th 5:27 PM - Never Expires
download | new post
